The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
The statement can hold as the right thing to do in a few cases but in multitudes of other cases, it is not the better approach. We know that education is a two-way process and any action from the part of child is important as it conforms to the two-way concept of education. Thus, it is essential on the part of teacher to deal with every action of the child appropriately, whether it is positive or negative.
The role of teacher is not just to teach but to give each child appropriate attention and try to extort responses and queries from them. But all children are not born as perfect students. Some of them might have notorious tendencies which can give rise to negative actions. Now, a teacher can take two approaches towards such actions. Either they can ignore such actions or they can take it upon themselves to convert those actions to positive ones. While it is the proper thing to do to praise the positive actions as it develops self-confidence in students and they feel like they are appreciated. But the negative actions deserve equal attention too. If you just let them slide by, they can attain greater degree of negativity and those children might turn into malefactors of society. As an educator, the aim should be to avoid such situations as much as possible because education does not only mean preaching knowledge but also shaping the individuals as all-rounded citizens. Due to this reason, it is necessary to acknowledge every action of each child and take appropriate measures towards them. For instance, if a student, rather than studying, always disturbs other students and doesn’t even let them study and is the most noisome among all students. Then the teacher cannot afford to just ignore him/her and let it go. The teacher should try first to talk to the child and make him understand why he should not continue his notorious behaviour. If the child is still unable to understand, then the teacher should refer him/her to the school counsellor. If the malicious behavior persists in the child, then the final step should be to contact the parents of the child and discuss the problem with them and suggest appropriate measures about how they can help their child in order to become a good student.
In few cases, however, it is good to let the negative action slide by. For instance, if a teacher asks a question and there is one child who raises his/her hand and another student who immediately starts speaking to give the answer. Then the teacher should not ignore the student who raised his/her hand even if the other student was speaking the right answer. This lowers confidence in the student who raised his/her hand because he/she feels like it is no use to know answers because the teacher doesn’t appreciate him/her. In this case, the teacher should ignore the negative action of the other student and acknowledge the student who raised his/her to answer the question which is the proper etiquette. But, this is a one in a thousand case where it is best to ignore the negative action. Otherwise, every action is equally acknowledgeable of a student. Every action of the student deserves the attention of the teacher. That is one of the essential traits of a good teacher. Hence, a good teacher should give consideration to the positive as well as the negative actions of a student.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 635, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to equal'
Suggestion: to equal
...iated. But the negative actions deserve equal attention too. If you just let them sli...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...hand because he/she feels like it is no use to know answers because the teacher doe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, still, then, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 33.0505617978 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2763.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 576.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.796875 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89897948557 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6283042246 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.423611111111 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 854.1 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4689438755 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6785714286 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220893873312 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668722304875 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074265358226 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143221018147 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00810505422984 0.0667264976115 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.