Teaching to anyone is quite difficult. Mother is the first teacher of a baby. She teaches the baby with lots of love. She feels happy when her kids listen to him. she praises for all good (positive) actions. But, she does not ignore negative actions. Mother is the teacher, who talks to kids politely to not do negative ones.
There are many examples of teaching, Where teacher does not ignore negative actions, but yes praise positive actions. Man is a social animal. Who learns everything in society, If a man, who just break a one rule of society, All people of society will move forward against him to punish. Anybody as a teacher, if he/she ignores negative actions, sometimes it helps sometimes it doesnot. For a learner driver, if his/her instructor had ignored his wrong driving practises, person will not able to pass his driving test. He/She will not get driving license.
In daily life of human being, the person who ignores negative actions, he/she can face trouble in future. Not a single animal or person can learn without making mistakes. Parents/Teachers/Bosses, everybody should not ignore negative actions. They should help to improve in doing positive actions. Yes They should praise for good actions.
In politics, Leaders promise with public to get their vote. After getting power, politicians, just forget their promises, and they make money. They just don't remember any promises. Public is not insane. They will teach a lesson to their politicians in next elections. When these politicians come again for their vote.. They just don't vote for these politicians. We can see that, there are
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...eels happy when her kids listen to him. she praises for all good positive actions. ...
^^^
Line 2, column 359, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'helps'.
Suggestion: sometimes helps
... ignores negative actions, sometimes it helps sometimes it doesnot. For a learner driver, if h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mes it helps sometimes it doesnot. For a learner driver, if his/her instructor ha...
^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...gative actions, he/she can face trouble in future. Not a single animal or person can lear...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...romises, and they make money. They just dont remember any promises. Public is not in...
^^^^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch a lesson to their politicians in next elections. When these politicians come a...
^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...se politicians come again for their vote.. They just dont vote for these politicia...
^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s come again for their vote.. They just dont vote for these politicians. We can see ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... politicians. We can see that, there are
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 58.6224719101 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 12.9106741573 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 2235.4752809 60% => OK
No of words: 268.0 442.535393258 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0223880597 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62734264666 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574626865672 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 704.065955056 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 23.0359550562 43% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8665042344 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 51.7692307692 118.986275619 44% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.3076923077 23.4991977007 44% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 0.692307692308 5.21951772744 13% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189915749852 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052975542475 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062364421422 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123036744716 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688447844824 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 14.1392134831 52% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.33 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 12.1743820225 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.36 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 100.480337079 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 11.8971910112 34% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 11.2143820225 54% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.