The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree
with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take.
In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in
which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and
explain how these examples shape your position.
We have heard many times that people will learn from their mistakes. If they do not understand about the negative aspect of their actions, they won’t have the chance to improve and learn new things. Therefore, the best way to teach is to praise positive actions but do not ignore negative ones.
To begin with, children go to school to learn Mathematical, Physical facts and so forth, as well as learning about life to be prepared for entering in society. We cannot ignore that praising positive actions help students having more motivation and confidence. Encouragement injects hope and inspiration to children that is necessary for them to succeed. However, if they do not receive any notice regarding their negative actions, they will be complacent, and in the future, they cannot tolerate any criticism. Entering in society requires many skills and abilities that children should learn them in the schools and educational institutions. The truth is that no one, in society, will not ignore the negative actions. Hence, if a person does not have the experience of noticing the negative actions, he won’t be able to interact effectively, with other people in the society. Therefore, during the education, it’s imperative to be praised for the positive actions and be aware of the negative ones.
Moreover, when an employee does a wrong action that might harm the company which he works for, it’s necessary that his supervisor or the manager do not ignore that negative action. Always, feedbacks will be helpful in the workplaces, either positive ones or negative ones. Positive feedback will encourage the employees to work harder and more effective in the future. Negative feedbacks will help the employees to correct their wrong actions, and prevent from harming the outcome of a project or the goal of the group.
An audit company, in Sacramento, has released its effective working system that would be useful to be adopted by other companies. They divide each group of employees to the subgroups that should provide feedbacks, periodically, to improve their efficiencies. At the end of each month, they gather the feedbacks and based on them, praise the positive actions that help the company and other employees, or set a meeting for employees that had negative actions. In those meetings, they examine the negative action with the employee that did it, and then explain to him how to be prepared for the future not to repeat it again. In this way, they have improved their outcomes and they are successful to attract many customers.
In conclusion, the best way of teaching is to admire the positive actions, as well as noticing the negative ones to have a better and more effective learning process.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Always' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
...ger do not ignore that negative action. Always, feedbacks will be helpful in the workp...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... successful to attract many customers. In conclusion, the best way of teaching is...
^^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er and more effective learning process.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2274.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06458797327 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65633503028 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469933184855 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7552780621 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.285714286 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.380952381 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38095238095 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18802716086 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716176184072 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719900388263 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128065532705 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209465691526 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.