The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The recommendation suggests that the best way for teaching is to praise good actions and ignore negative ones. There can be many ways for guiding a children or student as a parent or teacher but I am not certain that the prompt’s suggestion is the best or beneficial way to teach. Although I agree with the point of praising positive actions but ignoring negative ones does not seem to be a good choice.
Firstly, ignoring any kinds of behavior or actions is a harmful idea. Simply put, it is detrimental for tutors or parents to not have any interest on their kid’s actions whether the action is good or bad. While most of the children are nice, good behaving boy or girl in their youth, some of them alter their characteristics or behaviors when they go through the puberty and becomes a teenager. This is usually caused by ignorance and lose of interest to their kids. Since becoming a teenager, children spends less time with their family and go along with their friends more. In some cases, they hang out with misbehaving friends who colors them who were nice and kind. In these cases, parents or teachers should pay attention to the misconducts and misbehaviors of their juniors and guide them to not follow the negative routes.
Humans repeat their same mistakes every time. Even much experienced, well- educated adults makes same mistakes which they did in the past. How will juvenile students which goes through intensive education period learning about our society and moral standards behave when they do not learn about their wrong doings? It is especially more important for them to be taught about righteousness and appropriate behaviors, manners, and morals. Indeed, even an intelligent person can’t be smart from the beginning without being informed about what is right or wrong. Pointing out negative actions and correcting it is very crucial in teaching juniors.
Nevertheless, some might argue that praising good actions should be the most valued way of teaching. It is important to invigorate children or students and make them be confident because this leads to beneficial cycle. Eventually, good actions lead to praises and praises leads to another good action, repeating on and on. However, this might exactly hold true for the vicious cycle of wrong doings as well. Misbehaviors and its ignorance can lead to other negative actions. Thereby, to say it is important to not ignore negative actions and rather, reprimanding or instructing or any other kinds of actions are required for teaching better is justified.
Ignoring is bad for any kind of actions, and responding in any way whether it is appreciating or rebuking, is necessary. Furthermore, to construct an appropriate manner and concepts for growing and learning children, it is requisite for teachers to guide their bad actions. In conclusion, for the abovementioned reasons, I mostly disagree with the idea that praising positive actions and ignoring negative actions are the best way for teaching.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a child' or simply 'children'?
Suggestion: a child; children
...nes. There can be many ways for guiding a children or student as a parent or teacher but I...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, in conclusion, kind of, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 36.0 14.8657303371 242% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2501.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 493.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07302231237 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72864334971 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505070993915 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 756.0 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8359421155 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.04 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.72 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221697968693 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720199271213 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807755495394 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148883191096 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881163512179 0.0667264976115 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a child' or simply 'children'?
Suggestion: a child; children
...nes. There can be many ways for guiding a children or student as a parent or teacher but I...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, in conclusion, kind of, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 36.0 14.8657303371 242% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2501.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 493.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07302231237 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72864334971 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505070993915 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 756.0 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8359421155 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.04 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.72 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221697968693 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720199271213 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807755495394 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148883191096 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881163512179 0.0667264976115 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.