The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree
with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take.
In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in
which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and
explain how these examples shape your position.
The prompt states that the best way to teach is to praise positive and ignore negative ones. I mostly disagree with the statement and argue that the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and criticize negative actions. My stance is based on two reasons.
Firstly, if someone really done anything great, then he or she deserve appreciation and praise. A proper appreciation for a positive action motivate the learners to learn more good things and help them to continue their study. For example, an underground music band has released their original album instead of some cover song. Most of the underground bands are inclined to cover some famous songs, but those who are trying to come up with new songs, deserve a proper appreciation from the listener. A proper appreciation for their new song will inspire them to make new song, and new song is necessary to make music affluent. This example shows us that praise for something positive and innovative one is necessary for the continuous flow of those positive words.
Secondly, criticizing for the negative actions act as a warning that no one should continue those type of activities further. If anyone ignore the negative activities done by a learner, then this may lead to an indirect permission of doing that action again. For instances, a child of 5 years old stole a pencil from his classmate. If parents ignore the action after knowing, then this ignorance may permit the child for further stealing. When he will be grown up, there is possibilities that he will be a thief, but if parents take necessary steps after knowing that their child stole something, then the child may not continue stealing again. Therefore, criticize for the negative action is also necessary as much as praising for the positive action for proper teaching.
However, excess of any thing is not good. Excess praising may make someone to become over confident. For example, if someone is praised overly, then they may think this is the apex of their learning, which will be harmful. On the other hand, if someone criticize overly may make him or her depressed and this will hinder his or her learning process. Therefore, praising and criticizing should in limit.
In conclusion, praising positive actions is inspirational, which will help someone to learn more; however, if we ignore negative actions, then it may result to appreciate those negative actions indirectly. Therefore, the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and criticize for the negative actions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'deserves'.
Suggestion: deserves
...lly done anything great, then he or she deserve appreciation and praise. A proper appre...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'ignores'.
Suggestion: ignores
...e type of activities further. If anyone ignore the negative activities done by a learn...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 466, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[3]
Message: Did you mean 'there are possibilities'?
Suggestion: there are possibilities
...her stealing. When he will be grown up, there is possibilities that he will be a thief, but if parents...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 20, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
... proper teaching. However, excess of any thing is not good. Excess praising may make s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'criticizes'.
Suggestion: criticizes
... harmful. On the other hand, if someone criticize overly may make him or her depressed an...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2111.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01425178147 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6180707468 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46080760095 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 665.1 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5678051535 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9545454545 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1363636364 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86363636364 5.21951772744 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243750451519 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892990305488 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952422971791 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175620117089 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0979136400778 0.0667264976115 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.