Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice. There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our solar system. Though we often hear ideas about establishing colonies of humans to live and work on our Moon or our neighboring planet, Mars, some think that sending people to an asteroid would actually be the best colonization option for a number of reasons.
Low Gravity
To begin with, asteroids are often much smaller than planets, so they have lower gravity. When landing a spaceship, the craft would not be pulled as strongly or as forcefully toward the asteroid’s surface, making the landing safer than landing on the Moon or Mars; it would also allow a spacecraft to carry much more equipment needed to set up the colony. It would also be easier for the spacecraft to take off again, so the spaceship would need to carry considerably less fuel for the trip back to Earth.
Mining Valuable Metals
Next, some asteroids are rich in valuable elements and precious metals that are relatively rare on Earth, such as gold and platinum. An asteroid colony would be extremely profitable and a good source of these raw materials. The colonists or businesses sponsoring them could more than pay for the cost of their support by mining minerals and sending them back to Earth.
Easy to Reach
Finally, asteroids are a good option for colonization because some of them would be very easy to reach. There are a number of asteroids that periodically come within or near Earth’s orbit. Some of them actually get closer to Earth than our Moon. So these asteroids would be much easier and more affordable to get to and get back from than a planet like Mars, which would require a two-year trip in each direction.
The article states that sending people to the asteroids will be the best colonization option for the people and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor in the lecture explains that colonization in the asteroids is not the best option as it has some limitations, and it is impractical. The professor repudiates each of the reasons and explain the other side of the reasons.
First, the reading claims that asteroids have lower gravity, which will facilitate the spaceships for safer landing and will able to carry more equipment more efficiently. Notwithstanding, the professor refutes this point by explaining that lower gravity will cause health problem to the astronauts. He expounds that lower gravity is harmful for the health of the travelers. It will cause density loss of the muscles and bones, and the travelers will not survive in this condition.
Second, the author of the passage posits that there are valuable elements and precious metals in the asteroids, which will make the colonization more profitable. On the contrary, the professor challenges this view also and describes that the price of the precious metals and elements may not remain the same as present. According the professor, if there is cornucopia of valuable metals and elements, then the supply will increase, which will cause to decrease the price of the elements. Thus, the plan may not be profitable as assumed.
Third, the writer of the article mentions that to reach in the asteroids is easier that any other planets and the moon because sometimes the asteroids reach much near to the earth. Nevertheless, the professor opposes this reason also by explaining that it may easier to reach, but to get back may not be easy step for the travelers. He presents that sometimes the asteroids may be closer to the earth, but they have not the fixed orbit, so there is a possibility that when the astronauts will intend to get back, at that time, asteroids may be far from the earth. Therefore, to get back from the asteroids will be challenging.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | xujia | 75 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | YasamanEsml | 32 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | YasamanEsml | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | YasamanEsml | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | YasamanEsml | 3 | view |
- The following report appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces A study reports that in nearby East M 79
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- 4 Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing 50
- Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
- Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e professor in the lecture explains that colonization in the asteroids is not the...
^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...explaining that lower gravity will cause health problem to the astronauts. He exp...
^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'decreasing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: decreasing
... supply will increase, which will cause to decrease the price of the elements. Thus, the pl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rth. Nevertheless, the professor opposes this reason also by explaining that it m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, third, thus, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 341.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00879765396 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73178449371 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457478005865 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 517.5 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4382768755 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.866666667 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0662445241237 0.272083759551 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0254248364295 0.0996497079465 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355224670649 0.0662205650399 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0406464849125 0.162205337803 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339335746946 0.0443174109184 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.