The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The society has built up educational institution for the teaching of it's people. The prompt argues about this issue and claims that best way for teaching it's people by praising the positive actions of people and ignoring the negative actions. In my opinion I mostly agree with the prompt for two reason which I will explain below. However, I do concede that criticizing the negative actions are also necessary in teaching people.
To begin, praising positive actions are necessary in case of teaching cause it will give the person more motivation for doing more positvie work. For example, If we think about today's pandemic situation, many of the health care workers are working really hard to keep the pandemic in manageable limit. If we do not praise them, it will demotivate them, and they will be hesitant to do further humanitarian work. Moreover, praising the positve works of these health care worker also send a message to the other people of the society that it is a good work, and indirectly suggest them to do more of these work to get praised.
Furthermore, praising the positve actions are helpful in teaching cause it gives a person the certainity that he is on the right track. For instance, if we think about a situation where a person has to take decission which has a negative consequence as well as positive consequences. The person is in huge pressure regarding the situaion, and finally he makes a decission. If we do not praise his decission, he will not know that he has made a good decission and will be unsure of himself. This is going to discourage him doing the positive work again.
Admittedly, criticizing the negative actions of people are also helpful in teaching because it discourges other people to take negative action and it also ensures them about their stance. For instance, if we think about a politician doing a lot of bad work the country, if we do not criticize him it will give a message to other that they can also do this kind of work and get away from it. If we criticize their work it will going to discourage them to do such work further.
To conclude, praising the positive acitons of people are helpful in teaching cause it gives the encourage and motivation to do further work. However, criticizing their negative works are also necessary in discouraging them to do further negative work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this health' or 'these healths'?
Suggestion: this health; these healths
...Moreover, praising the positve works of these health care worker also send a message to the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 392, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...this kind of work and get away from it. If we criticize their work it will going t...
^^
Line 7, column 427, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'go'
Suggestion: go
... it. If we criticize their work it will going to discourage them to do such work furt...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 93, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... are helpful in teaching cause it gives the encourage and motivation to do further work. Howe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, really, regarding, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, kind of, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78378378378 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6277638406 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.400491400491 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 627.3 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3406234609 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.166666667 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6111111111 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.21951772744 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16102987381 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708499486533 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635905339302 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118215304142 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787035410424 0.0667264976115 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.