IELTS UP
WRITING TASK 1
The line graph provides information about percentage of regional household recycling in the UK, France, and Germany from the year 2005 to 2015.
Overall, the recycling rates of UK and Germany showed an upward trend while the percentage of recycling of France showed a downward trend.
In 2005, German recycled 20% of their household product compared to the British whose recycling was well under 40%. The British rate showed an increase and reached 40% in 2007 and remained steady up until 2009. After 2009, the British has a significant increase in the waste management and reached about 55% in 2011. It continued to increase its waste management and hit the maximum point in 2015 and that was 60%. On the contrary, German recycling rate increased in positive way and reached about 45% in 2011. It’s rate continued to surge and hit the highest point of about 56% in 2015.
In 2005, the French recycling was 50% which was declining and reached around 35% in 2009. It’s declined continued in the following years and reached the lowest point in 2013 which was 30%. After that, the French tried to increase its recycling but it could not reach 40% after the end of the period
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-19 | Kawsar Ahmed | 11 | view |
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books We recommend that Monarch Books open a caf in its store Monarch having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years has a large customer base because it is 68
- IELTS UP WRITING TASK 1 11
- Some people think that it is beneficial for children to do paid work while others think that it can be harmful for children Do you think that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005 Plan B shows the same place in the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart provides information about percentage of divorce in Finland and Sweden between 2011 to 2015 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, well, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82266009852 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3806103599 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507389162562 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.9213247138 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.0 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0139891028849 0.215688989381 6% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00694996574451 0.103423049105 7% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0219777214128 0.0843802449381 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00584962488499 0.15604864568 4% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.010131847506 0.0819641961636 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.