The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Any aspect be it some development activities, a new hypothesis or even human behaviour, all of these have a postitive as well as negative side. It is the nature of some human to focus on the bad side where as some has proclivity to prioritize good sides. The prompt suggest that a didactic method must hail proper actions and foresee bad ones. I mostly disagree with the prompt in two ways. However, I concede that there are a few cases where simple bad attributes must be neglected.
First of all, there is a common saying that mistakes are best teacher. Mistakes must be made known and precaution or improvement be made so that, the flaw does not repeat. These wrongdoings are done either deliberately or due to naivety. The improper act performed ignorantly must be instructed and advised so that, it won't occur again. But, the misdeed done knowingly must be punished and must never let go without actions. These activities helps a lot in reducing the felony which ultimately results for betterment of society.
Secondly, both excessive adulteration and overly pessimistic way of thinking are pernicuous. A person must be praised to a certain degree that does not develop arrogance and flamboyance in him. Further, continuous pinching to a person who has done mistakes reduces his confidence and hope for improvement. Both clap in a proper etiquette and admonishment on wrongdoings must be balanced inorder for providing and maintaining correct track by a person.
However, some humdrum situtaions must always be ignored. Lambasating for even a minor error is a besetted action. For example, a roommate of hostel who is friendly, supportive and has every other behaviour proper but is avarice, this greeed for food of the person must be ignored for a harmonious environment in the room. Nothing is ever immaculate and some flaws must always be considered.
In conclusion, teaching is a process of galvanizing a person with proper behaviour. In doing so, some misconducts must be corrected whereas some must be ignored depending on the severity of the negative actions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... of some human to focus on the bad side where as some has proclivity to prioritize good ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 54, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'are the best'.
Suggestion: are the best
... there is a common saying that mistakes are best teacher. Mistakes must be made known an...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 442, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'help'.
Suggestion: help
...et go without actions. These activities helps a lot in reducing the felony which ulti...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 58.6224719101 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 344.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04069767442 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88941205111 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572674418605 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7366279322 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.5714285714 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.380952381 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2380952381 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0826452801141 0.243740707755 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0292918577656 0.0831039109588 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0261575707749 0.0758088955206 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.052633114434 0.150359130593 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00767870473651 0.0667264976115 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.