Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage

Essay topics:

Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage.

Both the reading passage and lecture discusses about casein packaging . The former one points three benefits of using this milk based wrapping whereas latter one contends these benefits.
First of all, the passage says that casein-based plastic package reduces waste because its main component are milk and protein. These wrappers are biodegradable and can dissolve in water. However, the lecture asserts that due to suceptibility of water to these milk based package, they require extra protective layer. The only option available is synthetic materials which are even more harmful to the environment. So, casein package cannot wane the quantity of waste.
Secondly, the author of the passage mentions that food is kept fresh when stored in casein package because they block oxygen and avoid spoilage. On the other hand, professor argues that due to vulnerability of the cover to water they cannot be spoilage free and release water molecule. Moreover, they have low elasticity and also alters the taste of the product stored. Hence, they cannot keep fresh and lekage free product.
Finally, the reading passage claims that casein package are nutritious to health since casein contains proteins, hydroxyl and ammino groups, vitamins and probiotics. So, the are good for bones and muscle. In contrast, the lecture mentions that this protective layer is not good for people with milk allergy. If people allergic to milk eat these covers, they will have similar impacts as that of consuming dairy products. This is a big threat to some people and might have painstaking outcomes.
In conclusion, the reading passage and the lecture, even though have a common topic, one of them shows the positive side of a type of packaging whereas another contradicts these claimed benefits and informs auch packaging as perilious.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...lecture discusses about casein packaging . The former one points three benefits of...
^^
Line 4, column 171, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...no groups, vitamins and probiotics. So, the are good for bones and muscle. In contrast,...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27586206897 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50667911888 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58275862069 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.9952419787 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35294117647 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127976072638 0.272083759551 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038928301309 0.0996497079465 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347480463772 0.0662205650399 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0740246619702 0.162205337803 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329211495191 0.0443174109184 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.