The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Any organization needs a leader who directs and controls its activity. When the organization reach the suffice mostly leaders are touted and the future is seemly considered dependent on the virtues of the person in charge. The prompt discusses that the acquition of a nation, the greatest organization, is determined by the increse in status of the people, not by the person leading it. I mostly agree with the prompt and provide two explanations regarding it. However, I concede a few cases where the qualitites of the important persons are also well observed.
First of all, the numbers of important people in a nation is always less than the number of common people. Based on the numbers, erudite people can always be considered minority while comparing with the common people. So, the actual representation can only be credilble, if it accomodates large people not a small group. For instance, Arab countries are still considered underdeveloped comparing to European countries even though their rulers are much welthy than the leaders of Europe. This is because the average life status of people in Europe is higher than that of people residing in Arab. It is a good case where the welfare of people is a surest indicator rather than the condition of the rulers.
Secondly, the achievements of these rulers, artist, scientist or other luminous people can be considered true only when they are lucrative to the common ones. For example, a discovery of scientist can be considered great, if it helps other people in making their life esaier or provide more knowledge in that field. A ruler can only be considered successful, if he is able to bring positive changes in people lifestyle. Thus, for being a prudent person one must contribute something better for ordinary people.
However, during conferences, international meetings people who represet a nation are the true face of the country. An articulate spokesperson, artist are the symbol of overall people of the country. Success of the person in those international contest gives the overall view off the people living in that area. For instance, an artist who draws about the culture of his locality when wins a global competition gives the detailed view of the counte as well as its people. Here, the representative of a nation is the indicator of the people.
Thus, in conclusion, when considering the success of a country the betterment of the people residing there is a pivotal factor. Sometimes these representatives must also be personally good inorder to provide a great view of the nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s activity. When the organization reach the suffice mostly leaders are touted and the futur...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 644, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ood case where the welfare of people is a surest indicator rather than the condit...
^
Line 2, column 704, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ather than the condition of the rulers. Secondly, the achievements of these rule...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2139.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 424.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04481132075 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86274416536 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495283018868 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2977305972 60.3974514979 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.2272727273 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 5.21951772744 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185816819431 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595025756532 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412380571126 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101077884696 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168299864764 0.0667264976115 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.