Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Teaching is a process of improving; be it the change from bad to good or further revision of the known fact. The prompt discusses that an instructor must focus only on the good side of his students and completely blind-fold their bad sides. However, I mostly disagree with the prompt and provide two explanations regarding it, but I do concede a few cases where large focus on negative aspect is a bane.
First of all, noone or nothing can be immaculate and certainly have some places for improvement. A good teacher must find the area where his student can do better. Focussing only on positive actions and being complacent on what is achieved hinders progress. For example when a child who stood first in art competition in school if only hailed, may not give much effort to improve his talent. But, if the child is taken to state level or country level where a small error or ambiguity in his art can make a large difference is shown perspiciously, the child certainly become more assiduous and raise his level of drawing. Showing a room of improvement to a person can be base for development of his ability.
Secondly, some person may be doing wrong process due to ignorance because he may not know how to do it in a proper way and may find his own method precise. For example, an English student who have a wrong habit of pronouncing some words incorrectly but have a good speaking tone if not taught to spell those words correctly , will continue to speak in same manner in the way he thinks right. Only lauding the person tone and ignoring his mispronunciation does not do good for the person.
However, persistently focussing on the bad side may dissuade a person. Praise is a pivotal factor for giving person energy and tenacity to do better in his life. Only stinging on the negative deeds of the person can develop frivolous manner in him and also sap his enthusiasm. A child habitual to getting severe sold from his parents does not hesitate to do wrong activities; relentless tiff over mistakes develop obstinate behaviour in any person.
In conclusion, any negative actions must never be undermined and must always be made lucid to a person. In doing so, contionuous pinching due to bad outcomes is pernicous so praise for proper ettiquete is required in a commensurate amount.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ce because he may not know how to do it in a proper way and may find his own method precise. Fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ot taught to spell those words correctly , will continue to speak in same manner i...
^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e is required in a commensurate amount.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1896.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 401.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72817955112 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7060606586 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526184538653 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2944545597 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.333333333 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2777777778 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0753449454382 0.243740707755 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0299267005297 0.0831039109588 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337153420779 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0462195236962 0.150359130593 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240396377107 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.