The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Every human comprises of both negative as well as positive aspect in their behavior. It is the choice on which we act makes us distinguishable. The prompt suggests to encourage the positive actions and ignore the negative ones in order to teach any individual. However, in my opinion, I only agree to this statement partially for three reasons.
To begin, praising any person's positive actions encourages the individual to continue the same line of behavior. For instance, A child sees a person dropping their wallet in the road. The child picks it up and handovers the wallet to the person. The person becomes happy and praises the child's behavior and reward his with toffees. The child is going to feel that he did something worthy and is likely to continue the actions. The reward might be the temporary catalyst for the child to continue his good deed but eventually that will turn into a habit and despite the absence of reward, she is going to keep up the right work. So, to praise someone for their actions is definitely going to set up a temporary incentive for them to take that path and eventually turn it into their subconscious habitual task.
Furthermore, Most of the people does the work that gets them other's attention. Ignoring the negative actions makes any person feel that they won't get any attention by this work and possibly ends up pushing away those deeds. As an instance, the famous story of buddha consists of a angry man coming to him and scolding him every time with every possible bad words. Buddha continued ignoring the man focusing in his own work. The man was surprised by how calm buddha was. He continued insulting buddha and crying at him for days. But buddha showed no reaction at all and more over continued to do his work. Eventually, after few days, the man realized he is not going to get any attention by this behavior and ended up giving up the bad habit and embraced buddha. This shows how by not giving any attention to people's negative actions, we can discourage them to do such deeds and finally bring them to the right path.
However, this technique can have severe negative impact as well. Some people, especially children, can interpret the ignorance as the opportunity or the window to do the bad works. We can take this as an instance. A child was doing good in his studies and the parents used to praise him and love him a lot. One day the child brought a book not belonging to him to his home. The parents ignored this thinking this might be a mistake and continued to love him for his studies. This behavior continued and the child was always bringing some goods not belonging to him and ended up being a thief. This no negative feedback technique can backfire in a very bad way if not taken proper care.
Thus, There is no any fix way to teach any one good actions. Some can be better them others but no way is perfect. Same goes to this technique. One thing we can do to better this way is my praising the positive actions and ignoring the negative actions to an extent while keeping an eye up to the bad deeds as well. We can then hope that this technique can be relied upon.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
Every human comprises of both negative as well as positive aspec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
Every human comprises of both negative as well as positive aspect in their behavior. It i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggests encouraging'.
Suggestion: suggests encouraging
...ct makes us distinguishable. The prompt suggests to encourage the positive actions and ignore the neg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 332, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s behavior and reward his with toffees. The child is going to feel that he did some...
^^^
Line 2, column 427, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... and is likely to continue the actions. The reward might be the temporary catalyst ...
^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... the famous story of buddha consists of a angry man coming to him and scolding hi...
^
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...not taken proper care. Thus, There is no any fix way to teach any one good actio...
^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
... Thus, There is no any fix way to teach any one good actions. Some can be better them o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, then, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2573.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 566.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54593639576 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87757670434 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41500305554 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443462897527 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 810.0 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0767141944 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.9696969697 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1515151515 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138371604724 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402276100336 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465211392589 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102056310683 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605986391288 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 14.1392134831 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 48.8420337079 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.81 12.1639044944 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.