The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The research has shown that teaching is regarded as profession reserved exclusive for a scholars of any respective fields. Though the all teacher are accepted and acknowledged as scholar but their way of teaching makes a different role and overall direction in a student’s life. The prompt points towards teaching should be focussed on praising the positive actions and ignoring negative ones. I strongly agree with the prompt and also validate that praising the positive actions in teaching encourage the student to achieve his full potential. The following three validations justify my position.
First of all, in a field where discovery is required to bring a change how human beings exist in the physical world or how the language of universe was written, i.e., science and mathematics, it is advisable to teach and praise the positive actions. For instance, had the great physicist, i.e., Late Mr. Einstein forced to focus on improving his negative actions as raised by then known physicists related to Sir Isaac Newton, he would have not discovered the theory of relativity and time and space. It was the positive teachings given by his close aides to pursue what he think was right. Further, had Mr. Mahalanobis moulded to study other subjects to at least get a passing marks in classes, he would have not fabricated the one of the world’s most Mahalanobis model. It was the positive encouragement showered on him by his school teachers that made him to pursue his dreams. Both the above examples validate that praising the positive actions had produced great scholars. It matters because these scholars showed how positive actions brought about a change in physical world.
Secondly, in the field of nurturing the inherent talents and skills such as arts and sports, praising the positive actions has a potential to make it visible at the world stage. For instance, the great batsman of Cricket, i.e., Mr. Sachin had pushed to pursue his studies in order to pass at least school education though the talent of cricket was seen him from his childhood, he would have not become what he is today. He was able to achieve it because of his father who praised his positive cricket skills and encourage him to pursue it. Further, had the great Indian singer, i.e., Mrs. Lata forced to pursue classical dancing, because of her father’s inclination, where she floundered, she would have not got the 7 awards consistently for her voice. She was able to achieve it because of positive actions of her singing was praised and pursued with the support of her mother. Both the instances exemplify that positive actions brought about great Indian stars. It is significant since the field of arts and sports have proved that positive actions have produced someone to whom India is proud of.
Third, the practice of praising positive actions and ignoring the negative one is also followed in spiritual learning and moral improvement. For instance, the teaching of Late. Mahatama Gandhi asserted that if someone is willing to bring positive change in the world, then he has to be that positive change himself first and abstain from negative actions. Further, the teachings of Buddhism also states that the world which is replete with hatred, competition, cupidity and sorrow, it is the voice of the Almighty to follow and pursue only positive actions that will regenerate the hope in the masses and help people to overcome sorrow. Both the teachings delineate that how positive teachings can help a person to reach enlightenment. It is appreciable since it shows how positive actions can bring a change in the society.
Of however, some would argue that praising the positive one and ignoring the negative one would made someone precarious to his negatives or he would be incapable of rectify its weakness. However, this may not be true since if a person if praised or taught for his positive actions, he would have not any weakness. His weakness arises because he was taught to focus on his negatives. In conclusion, it is praising positive actions that can eliminate negative person, negative things from life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a scholar' or simply 'scholars'?
Suggestion: a scholar; scholars
...ed as profession reserved exclusive for a scholars of any respective fields. Though the al...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 575, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
...en by his close aides to pursue what he think was right. Further, had Mr. Mahalanobis...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 97, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...one and ignoring the negative one would made someone precarious to his negatives or ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 236, Rule ID: IF_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
... this may not be true since if a person if praised or taught for his positive acti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, as to, at least, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 33.0505617978 203% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3447.0 2235.4752809 154% => OK
No of words: 684.0 442.535393258 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03947368421 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.11403887952 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62714172694 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 298.0 215.323595506 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43567251462 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1071.0 704.065955056 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 6.24550561798 288% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9269234411 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.9 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 10.2758426966 214% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223459727276 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075373314261 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524314371634 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151864848209 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438387025154 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 100.480337079 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.