The best way to teach whether as an educator employer or parent is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positio

Essay topics:

The best way to teach — whether as an educator, employer, or parent — is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

The best teacher is one who understands a person and can help him or her fulfill their goals by giving perfect advice, while motivating the students serves as a driving force for the students in their actions, not correcting them while making a mistake may lead to serious consequences. The prompt recommends that the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore the negative ones. In my opinion, I disagree with the suggestion and argue that ignoring the negative actions can lead to various issues for the following reasons.
To begin, if anyone teaching anything to somebody starts ignoring negative actions made by them, it will lead to the person not knowing about the misconduct and they will make it a habit. For instance, if a kid in his teenage scoring extremely good marks during his schooling, uses harsh and abusive language while talking to elders, is only praised by his family members for the good numbers while his language is avoided, it will become his habit to continue doing the same for the rest of his life. The above example illustrates, how just not reprimanding a child and making him realize his negative actions make his character not a good fit for society.
Further, only praise for the good actions and no action for the negative ones will lead to the development of a person who is extremely self-proud and arrogant in nature. Think of praise as food, food is only good for the body in the right quantities, eating extra of which leads to obesity, in the same way too much praise without any criticism for wrongdoings, will make a person overbold and egotistical. For instance, a worker in the factory working very hard, helping other new workers to understand the working of the factory is praised by the owner every month and given an appraisal for his good deeds. The worker soon starts working only for the praise and loses interest in the work he is considered to do, eventually leading him or her to become addicted to praise. This illustrates how only praise and no action against misconduct bring about losing interest in a particular job.
Of course, it is true that praise leads to motivation which serves as a reason for people to work hard, and sometimes, ignoring the negative actions makes a person understand his fault, but in the end, there needs to be a balance between the two. A person should be praised for the good deeds and reprimanded for the bad deeds by the teacher and then only he or she may be a quick learner in life.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 22, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'teaches'.
Suggestion: teaches
...ollowing reasons. To begin, if anyone teaching anything to somebody starts ignoring ne...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 893, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut losing interest in a particular job. Of course, it is true that praise leads ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, then, while, for instance, of course, in my opinion, it is true, in the same way

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69476082005 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50880320754 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476082004556 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8991794622 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.538461538 118.986275619 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.7692307692 23.4991977007 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 5.21951772744 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140479845113 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750678708817 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701561823422 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100303152943 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044175259406 0.0667264976115 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 48.8420337079 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.