The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
It is not a easy to task to examine the character of people of a society accurately and according to the author of the passage, the best way to do this is to know about their role models. Undoubtedly, anyone can argue that there are numerous factors that affects the character of people and other numerous aspects to consider before coming to a conclusion about that. Considering this difficulties, I agree with author's assertion that to grab a superficial idea about the mass character of the people, it is ideal to examine their role models.
One needs to examine a significant portion of total people in a society in order to grab an overall idea about their character as a whole. Besides, it is also important to examine them in different aspect and this is almost an infinite task to accomplish without costing great effort and time. Undoubtedly, this is not the best approach to learn that.
First, we can predict the future of a society by knowing about their youth. Though it is not possible to learn each and every individual, but it is easy to find whom they are considering as role models. We often notice in certain societies youths have a tendency to follow the movie celebrities- their dress, hair style and gesture. Sometimes they try to mimic sports stars. This reveals their interest and that often help to judge their character as a whole. It is not surprising when a certain group chooses discoverer like Bear Grills, scientists like Einstein, Marie Curie as their hero and this gave us a total different hint about that group.
Additionally, politicians have one of the highest impact on life of a society. When a society choose their great political leader as their hero it indicates they are aware of politics and they appreciate the effort of there great leaders. That definitely defines certain aspect of their character.
In sum, it is quite impossible to have a very precise understanding about the character of a society without extensively examining the people belong to this. While this is a arduous and time consuming to examine a lot of people individually whereas society is changing continuously. Understanding this reality, it is a smarter way just to keep a tract whom they are choosing as their role model in certain society and this concise information mostly gives us a big hint about the society as a whole.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
It is not a easy to task to examine the character o...
^
Line 1, column 381, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...to a conclusion about that. Considering this difficulties, I agree with authors asse...
^^^^
Line 1, column 517, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... character of the people, it is ideal to examine their role models. One needs ...
^^
Line 9, column 173, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...he people belong to this. While this is a arduous and time consuming to examine a...
^
Line 9, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to examine a lot of people individually whereas society is changing continuously...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1955.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83910891089 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73262282024 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467821782178 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 635.4 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1249075582 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.611111111 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72222222222 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192787487906 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670512471916 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057060556275 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119959454615 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551620618538 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.