The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
The above lines stating that the best way of understanding the character of the society is by examining the character of men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or role models is a very subjective topic to be discussed. The society as a whole plays a vital role in maiaintaing the social economic and cultural relations among the people. Most of the times, a role model be it male or female is given the spotlight in the society by its people according to which various vissitudes might occur depending on the character of the role model. Nevertheless the people in the society are the ones on which the character and well being of the society depends on rather than a particular indidual.
It must be a combined effort of all the people in the society to ensure a safe and secure environment for all which might not possibly have nothing to do with the character of that particular person that the entire society treats as a role model or a hero. But having said that when the people of the scoiety chooses someone as their role model or hero, it is not to be taken lightly as there must be something unique about that particular person for which the people might have fell for and started treating him as a role model. The character and the nature of a role model deeply effects a lot of people thereby changing the character of the society accrodingly. Let us consider the example of the former president of the United States John. F. Kennedy, popularly known as JFK. JFK was one of the best examples that firmly goes witht the above lines. When JFK took office, the entire country was in shambles due to a great economic depression thereby leading to a big time unemployment and leading to the rise of shenanigans accross the country.
It was when he became the president that the entire complexion of the country has drastically changed. People have instantly accepted him as their hero during the primaries which led him to have a landslide victory against his republican counterpart then. The policies put forth by him and his regime have entirely boomed a flagging economy and rose the motivation of the people to work for the greater good. JFK has been a compete role model to not only a particular sector of people but for all sections including the working class people which made them to contribute to the society to their god given potential. In this way the complete character and the vibe of a plunging society has been improved when JFK took office in the late 60's and it is clearly evident that it is that man's desire and character that was emulated by all its people in the society.
Is it the best way to understand the society by examining the character of its role model? Yes. A strong leader with a great character motivates his people to work and flourish for the greater good thereby not only improving the lives of the people around him but improving the character as a whole of the enitre society and the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 553, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...ing on the character of the role model. Nevertheless the people in the society are the ones ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... he became the president that the entire complexion of the country has drasticall...
^^
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...work for the greater good. JFK has been a compete role model to not only a particular sec...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, nevertheless, so, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2436.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 529.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60491493384 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79583152331 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5101492806 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.41965973535 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 788.4 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.5519390256 60.3974514979 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.333333333 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3888888889 23.4991977007 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.83333333333 5.21951772744 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395759140782 0.243740707755 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157303018598 0.0831039109588 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.199289002145 0.0758088955206 263% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303581109642 0.150359130593 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153687676359 0.0667264976115 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.