Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
The above lines stating that the government should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than concentrating on trying to solve the problems of the future is a very subject topic to be discussed. Most of the countries across the globe have two things in common that they always try to ensure to its citizens thourghout their life. One being to provide a safe and secure environment to its people and the other being ensuring a strong economy which in return creates a bountiful amount of jobs for its people. As most of the countries in the world fear that a recession similar to 'THE 2008 Great Depression' will attack them sometime in the future, the countries have started to prepare certain necessary steps to avoid such fallout to the global economy.
Such measures taken by the governments across the globe are to be commended as they have been thinking about the future in advance putting their people's interests into priority. Such trepidations might discourage some people saying that the governments should concentrate more on the present issues rather than some anticipated problems of the future, but for most of it the governments have been garnering accolades for thinking about the future in order to make the world a better plae for its people. Having said that, most of the governements in the world have been shunning the most important factor that have been affecting the entire world today- Climate Change. Climate Change has been one of the most discussed topic around the world today due to increase in the Global Warming and Greenhouse emmissions in the recent times.
As far as the government across the globe have been doing fine with ensuring strong economies, it is high time that they have to concentrate on addressing the immediate problems of the present like Climate Change and Global Warming. Lets consider the Amazon forests for example based in South America which have been burning till date from the past twenty days. These forests are known to be as the 'Lungs of Earth' constituing around forty percent of the world's oxygen. These forests have been burning at a faster rate and the reason behind that has been large scale deforestation and human intervention on the flaura and fauna, thereby leading to rise in the atmospheric tempratures and Global Warming. Such temperature rise had led to the melting of the Arctic Glaciers thereby leading to floods across various countries in the world. Many environmentalists have started various movements to curb such important issue which can potentially wipe out the entire human race in not more than a century. But the governments have been desultory towards this issue and some of the authorities have been eshewed it stating that its a hoax. The fact of the matter is many scientific communities has been warning us since the past decade that the resources are being expolited at a much faster rate and we have been negligent towards such theories.
The governments across the globe should make sure that this is an escalated problem which has to be taken on high priority and various measures have to be taken along with the environmentalists to first address such an eminent problem of today by curbing Climate Change which has been adversely affecting our planet lately rather than trying to solve some anticiapated problems of the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...like Climate Change and Global Warming. Lets consider the Amazon forests for example...
^^^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts are known to be as the Lungs of Earth constituing around forty percent of the ...
^^
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...constituing around forty percent of the worlds oxygen. These forests have been burning...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1065, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e been desultory towards this issue and some of the authorities have been eshewed it statin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1123, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ities have been eshewed it stating that its a hoax. The fact of the matter is many ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2794.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 562.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97153024911 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86893614481 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59739246426 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450177935943 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 871.2 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.3338090439 60.3974514979 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.352941176 118.986275619 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0588235294 23.4991977007 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.23529411765 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240188630306 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825153913358 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149410619252 0.0758088955206 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195856680984 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110615025915 0.0667264976115 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 14.1392134831 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.