The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question its authority.
The above lines stating that the well being of a society shall be improved when the people of the society question it's authority is a vey subjective topic to be discussed. For long, many countries across the globe have been governed under various modes of leadership like democracy, communism, socialism and so on with the majority of the world being controlled by the democratic from of government. The authority or the officials serving under democracy abide by these three rules- of the people, by the people, and for the people for the welfare of the society. Such code of conduct set by the authority ensures the welfare of the society and a country's ecnonomy. Certain disturbances may sometimes arise in a regime where people become restive and try to question the credibility of their respective authority thereby creating an unrest among the government and its people.
Such activities which involve people showcasing a rebellion as a form of movement questioning its authorirty woud rather make things worse for the society than enhacing the same. Instead of such immediate outburts by some rebellious groups inciting the entire society agasint the authority, it would be a great deal where violence is tabled aside and truce is given a priority. In such cases people of the society must be equinanimous towards their approach and get started with some valued discussions with the authority. Having said that, it is a basic right for the people living in a society to question it's authotity for any misdeeds taking place amongst the society.
If the authority do not serve its people as expected and if they are involved in any abuse of power thereby derailing welfare of the society, the people have a right and will have to question the authority for any shenanigans that have been discrediting the society for long. There are cases where people in their highest form of authority are often accused of bribery and embezzlement but having the authority and power in hand, they try to cloak it the best way possible to avoid any accusations. In such cases the people of the society must raise their voice not for themselves but for the entire nation to ensure that no matter what the rank or portfolio of the person be, at the end of the day no one is above law. If any such misdeeds are done by the people in the authority, the common man has all the rights to request the legislative assembly to subpoena the concerned person for the court hearing.
Of course, some might argue that it might not be beneficial for the welfare of the society if we try to question the authority. However isn't that precisely why we should follow our heart and interests for the welfare of the society? IF we do so, we would end up getting the justice we deserve. We'd likely imrpove the enthusasiam that people have towards their society. And most importantly the well being of the society will be given a higher priority and shall be enhanced.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ty if we try to question the authority. However isnt that precisely why we should follo...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... try to question the authority. However isnt that precisely why we should follow our...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2437.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 508.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79724409449 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58057802513 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472440944882 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 796.5 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.1163259617 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.388888889 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2222222222 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353150499497 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117622571655 0.0831039109588 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100735624365 0.0758088955206 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23291253189 0.150359130593 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637571486045 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.