Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
I believe that those people in politics and government should step down after five years except for business and education. Alternating politics and governors because of corruption concerns while remaining the experts of business and education due to their specialties.
Politics and governors fields should alter their incumbent leaders every five years or even shorter, because the power often corrupts people gradually. In the beginning, as a politic wants to win the election, he or she tends to be passionate and have policies to execute to achieve his purpose for helping a whole nation. As time goes by, he or she is likely to be lured by money and become corrupted. For example, Taiwan ex-president Chen Shui-Bian was convicted for his corruption during his 2nd turn of the president around his position for 4 to 8 years. Therefore, we should keep switching politics every particular period of time in order to avoid corruption from happening.
As for education and business field, it is unnecessary to force experts to step down alternatively, because these fields require profession and specialties. For instance, Taiwan Central Bank executive Perng Fai-Nan has leaded banks of Taiwan for more than ten years and he has won as many as 10 tens A+ bank executive recognized by an international institution and this explain his excellent performance even 10 years passed by. His performance has to be reckoned with and he should be kept and stayed on the position so that Taiwan could benefit his contribution.
The naysayers may argue that there are also corruption for the leaders in the education and they should also step down after years. Indeed, there are some people on the top position in the education field corrupted after years as politics do. But, these corruption is likely to be prevented by unveiling the financial status by the government financial report which announces the detailed financial status of the officials of every field yearly. In Taiwan, these financial status of top officials are transparent. Not to mention, the president’s finances could not reflect his or her real status since he or she has the potency to hide money.
Furthermore, they on top position tend to be examined and monitored by a medium. If they do something wrong, the medium is going to report scandals or spread rumors quickly. Additionally, the cost for switching experts in education or business field is higher than politics or governors, because the established strategies and facilities need to be re-built as well as their social network.
In conclusion, politics and government should step down every five years for corruption concern, but fields requiring real professions like business and education could remain on their position for their knowledge and well-monitoring mechanism in the public.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'want'?
Suggestion: want
...adually. In the beginning, as a politic wants to win the election, he or she tends to...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 621, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...eep switching politics every particular period of time in order to avoid corruption from happe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 248, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this corruption' or 'these corruptions'?
Suggestion: this corruption; these corruptions
...rupted after years as politics do. But, these corruption is likely to be prevented by unveiling ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, as for, as to, except for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 12.9106741573 217% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2366.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88329032884 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487912087912 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 729.9 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2625062618 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.526315789 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9473684211 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36842105263 5.21951772744 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226025645708 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818524840242 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864644135431 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148265760794 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700481058322 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.