Claim:
In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
I partially agree with the claim in that as a ground rule to prevent power from injustice accumulation, it is essential to have a rotation of new leaders. However, I would argue the revitalization is not the only factor to the success of any enterprise, instead the succession of past legends is also critical to create continuing achievements.
To begin with, I agree that the elite group of any organization should rotate after a certain period. The major reason is that it is impossible for human beings to keep abreast of the fast changing of modern society in every aspect, so the new joiner of the elite group is vital in providing novel perspectives that are most updated with the current trends. In other words, the constantly changing nature of social development makes an ongoing change of elite groups more efficient and effective in managing the social disruption. This can be well demonstrated from the election that happened in Taiwan this January, in that the younger generation votes for the party that is considered to be more open and liberal to the social changes.
Furthermore, power is easily accumulated if no external interference exists. This point echoes the reason mentioned from the prompt that the revitalization through new leadership is essential to avoid injustice power accumulation. Examples can be found easily, especially in countries dominated by dictatorship, such as China. President Xi has legalized himself with the eternal ruling power of China, and he has adopted violent measurements toward Hong Kong, Tibet and other regions that are against the CPP power. Therefore, it illustrates well that with no periodic rotation of the leaders, injustice and violence easily spreads due to the support of the ruling power that is unable to be shaked.
However, besides the revitalization mentioned above, other equally significant contributing factors to the success of any organization is the succession of past achievements. I would assert that a sustainable organization is not only built upon leaders, but also relies on the institutional mechanisms that are followed by all the participants. Therefore, the leaders should be replaced periodically, but the positive mechanisms should be able to be passed to the successors. For instance, though Steve Jobs has passed away, Apple still strives after a new leader because of all the positive mechanisms that are performed.
In conclusion, it is vital to constantly change the leading group to avoid power domination of certain groups, while maintaining the mechanisms that keep the organizations strive and successful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 739, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...open and liberal to the social changes. Furthermore, power is easily accumulated...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 701, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ling power that is unable to be shaked. However, besides the revitalization ment...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2202.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 415.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30602409639 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06213204069 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518072289157 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 700.2 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.857679986 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.625 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9375 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.21951772744 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153192585332 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519371376131 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451127818489 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824907314042 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368333167676 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.