Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
I partially agree with the statement and I would argue that law itself should not be flexible while the interpretations of the law shall be flexible for the final judgements to be made in response to various conditions.
To begin with, law is the written form of agreeable moralities and is supported by the authority to ensure the stability of a society. Therefore, if law itself is flexible, it may harm its original objective of making a society safe. For example, since the law is the major principle for the authority to decide legal and illegal behaviors, it is arduous for the authority to convict illegal behaviors if the law is flexible. Also, the authority may find a way to sidestep the law and avoid lawful responsibility if they are more familiar with the flexible side of the law. Indeed, the” flexible” may refer to multiple meanings, and what I suggest here means the content of the law itself is too vague to perform its inherent functions, and hinder the essential convictions to stop crimes and dangers.
However, it is equally important to understand there are complicated conditions that can’t be purely examined by the law. Under this kind of circumstances, it is vital that the law has the flexibility for judges’ interpretation after incorporating considerations from other aspects, such as psycho, societal and even environmental factors. For instance, for the crime of indiscriminate attack, it is common that the attackers have psycho problems, so the judge should be able to interpret the law with the examination from attackers’ psycho history and make following judgements based on all the influential factors, which may change the understanding of the original written law itself. In fact, a more precise law in written form, actually makes this flexible interpretation more possible, in that judges can skip the time to understand the law itself and focus on the interrelated relation between the law and other facets.
In conclusion, I believe the law itself shall keep clear and precise to ensure its feasibility in practice and bolster a safe society. Nonetheless, it is also notable that law has its limitations, especially under the entwined social contexts, so the flexibility for interpretation to make just and fair judgements is critical for a society to achieve true justice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '“' seems to be missing
...he flexible side of the law. Indeed, the” flexible” may refer to multiple meaning...
^
Line 3, column 596, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '“' seems to be missing
...e side of the law. Indeed, the” flexible” may refer to multiple meanings, and wha...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 381.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13910761155 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0794415564 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51968503937 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.7908738776 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.166666667 118.986275619 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.75 23.4991977007 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5833333333 5.21951772744 241% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184304732478 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769350830347 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587559048473 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135810890278 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673147362241 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.