Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Does in any field business, politics, education, government those in power should step down after five years? I agree with this assertion because by changing the authority or those in power, it will to led these fields to grow and flourish in a tremendous way. By changing the authority, new people with new vision and ideas get the chance to run these fields well.
Firstly, in the business field, it is totally in the hand of the authority to grow and expand the business incorrect path and earn maximum profit. So, anyone who is is in the power had all the responsibility to thrive in the business and compete in the market. If he was not able to run the business on the right track then the business can go under the declining profit. Therefore, to maximize the profit, and regain its origi9nal position is is important to step down who is in power and select a new one. By doing this the business will go on the right track and can make tremendous profit. Secondly, in politics who is in power has the responsibility to drive the country an incorrect path and develop the country. He has power in his hand and can do everything to altruism the people of the country. If he was not able to fulfill his duty, then the country could go to the economic crisis, and there will be riot and violence in the country. So, in this condition, new people with correct vision is required to handle this situation. The only one way to solve this problem is to elect new authority and because of the older one. By doing this the country will thrive and will develop well.
Furthermore, in field of education, it is equally important to change the authority in five years. Firstly, they are elected for certain time to tackle the problem in education and run the education system in a good track. If he forgot his obligations, then the whole system would be affected negatively. And, to solve this problem a new person with a fertile mind should be selected and he can handle this problem and efficacy will be produced in the education sector. Moreover, in the government sector, the authority should also be changed in five years. By doing this the next generation will get the chance to solve the problem which the previous authority was unable to solve.
In sum, in any field like education, government, politics, and business it is crucial to change the authority in certain years. By doing so there is an opportunity for the newer one who has the vision to drive all these sectors in the right way and all sectors will be in a progressive way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a tremendous way" with adverb for "tremendous"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...o led these fields to grow and flourish in a tremendous way. By changing the authority, new people ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 162, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: is
...and earn maximum profit. So, anyone who is is in the power had all the responsibility...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...the business and compete in the market. If he was not able to run the business on ...
^^
Line 2, column 441, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: is
...ofit, and regain its origi9nal position is is important to step down who is in power ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2088.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 457.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56892778993 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52048001404 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.387308533917 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 662.4 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3743938383 60.3974514979 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.9090909091 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7727272727 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244984208312 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793714788886 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118927506711 0.0758088955206 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160579284322 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10657316391 0.0667264976115 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.