149 Claim No act is done purely for the benefit of others Reason All actions even those that seem to be done for other people are based on self interest Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the

Essay topics:

149. Claim: No act is done purely for the benefit of others. Reason: All actions — even those that seem to be done for other people — are based on self-interest. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

Somany argues that acts are done for the benefit for others. Alternatively, others say acts are done based for the self interest.
I agree for the next claim and the reason given.
Firstly, monitery donations are done by personal desires. Although, these actions are framed for helpinfg of others, thereare actually uterior motives at play. Take, for example, the donatio is given by the joff besos, the ceo of the amazon, to climate preservation. The CEO was pressured to donate to initiative to keep employs and the public happy. To the uiform, this donation can be seen at the benevolence to the society. However, the knowledgable can see that the donation was means to placate unruly public and the positive brand image. Aditionally, those who donate money and items to charity can get the reduce trhe taxs. Donators not only benefit othes, but also themselves.
Now in modern society, all peoples are busy doing their jobs. They only think about themselves, and no one is doing the act for helping others. If they help others, there is something hidden profit for themselves. We caN Take the example of the developed country, they are giving donations to the poor and undeveloped country for the grow up. There is a certain thing that ie hidden behind this benevolence. They also get the profit from the donation given to the country. They built up different infrastructures the poor country for development. By doing this they also use these structures for certain years for gaining profit. So there is always hidden self-interest in every donation.
Secondly, the acts in the community for social service is done for the benefit of the community. So there is no self-interest in this act. The acts like helping poor children and hungry people are pure generosity and there is no self-interest. These types of people are self-satisfied by helping others and they have no motive to get the profit from their works.
In sum, there are different notions for doing the act which can differ in the case of case studies.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the uiform, this donation can be seen at the benevolence to the society. However,...
^^
Line 3, column 610, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nate money and items to charity can get the reduce trhe taxs. Donators not only benefit ot...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 330, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...to the poor and undeveloped country for the grow up. There is a certain thing that ie hi...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 343.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91253644315 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65007681436 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518950437318 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.0577015333 60.3974514979 38% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.4 118.986275619 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.72 23.4991977007 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.32 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291509656873 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894086716781 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865185497523 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19212960361 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106099251429 0.0667264976115 159% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 14.1392134831 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 48.8420337079 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.