Claim: No act is done purely for the benefit of others.
Reason: All actions — even those that seem to be done for other people — are based on self-interest.
149. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
I agree with the claim that “No act is done purely for the benefit of others “, and all actions that seem to be done for others are based on self-interest. All the people who are doing altruism for the other people have some self motives behind them. The self motives may be self- satisfaction or another thing. So, there is no such activity that is done totally benefit of others.
Let’s take an example of CEO of the Amazon, who have donated million dollars to the welfare of the peoples. There was a certain motive behind this donation of the money. He was forced by his employees and others for this donation. Another example we can take is Billgate and Malinda Gate foundation who have donated millions of money for the welfare of homeless people and others. There was also be certain hidden self- interest behind this altruism.
However, some acts can be seen that are done for totally done for the benefit of others, but by analyzing thoroughly we can find certain motives behind that work. Some people do altruism for gaining fame, some do for their tax cut, and some do for their self-satisfaction. Therefore, it is clearly seen that no work in this world is done purely for others' benefit and there is some cause behind this altruism.
Furthermore, in this modern world, all people are selfish, and they are busy in gaining money and making their lives luxurious. They have no time for helping other peoples and doing charity works. All are thinking about their own personal life and nobody have time to think about other people, so if they do anything for helping others, there is absolutely certain motives and expectation behind that help. In also politics, the politicians make a development scheme to gain the votes for their election. So, from this, we can clearly say that they have a certain self-benefit behind this development scheme.
In addition, not all people seek benefits from helping the others, there are many examples like Mother Teresa, who has devoted her whole life for the help of the needy people. But, this type of peoples are found rarely in human society. So, in sum, it is clear that no work in this world is done purely benefit for others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 29, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
I agree with the claim that “No act is done purely for the benefit of...
^
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...s done purely for the benefit of others “, and all actions that seem to be done f...
^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... of CEO of the Amazon, who have donated million dollars to the welfare of the peoples. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...eless people and others. There was also be certain hidden self- interest behind th...
^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'nobody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...bout their own personal life and nobody have time to think about other people, so if...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, another thing, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 383.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73107049608 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36005624885 2.79657885939 84% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456919060052 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 575.1 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3987038977 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.15 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311440311078 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119165909599 0.0831039109588 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136896881167 0.0758088955206 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214097103602 0.150359130593 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149731760691 0.0667264976115 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.