Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Information assumed as fact most often can be vulnerable in case of trust issue. Most of the cases can be false or mendate. So, to avoid treachery one should not consider any information as a fact without havimg trustworthy sources. I mostly agree with the prompt and the reason behind it is described below:
One can misconstrue any news or information at any time by any means. If you get an awkward news or piece of information, you should not judge it instantly. Rather judgiong instantly, you should try to know about the information personally. For example, if you hear from someone that one of your friends has taunt you behind your back, you may get angry and your friendship might be at danger. So, try to confirm that the information was true and then react to it. Otherwise, your friendship between you and your friend might get destroyed because of misconstrue of the fact.
At job sector it is often found that one employee tries to surpass another employee by trickery or calumny. So, if one is trying to hinder your progress, the easy way is to misconstrue the information you needed. If you are duped by this , your success at job might be at stake even you can get fired from your job.
Not all the information are inaccurate also. All you need is to be cautious about what you hear and how you react. Don’t judge immediately rather act wisely and constructively. Try to reach the actual fact and then take the action accordingly. Because a renowned verse is often said, “Think before you leap”.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...ion, you should not judge it instantly. Rather judgiong instantly, you should try to k...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 309, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'taunted'.
Suggestion: taunted
...om someone that one of your friends has taunt you behind your back, you may get angry...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ion you needed. If you are duped by this , your success at job might be at stake e...
^^
Line 4, column 40, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... Not all the information are inaccurate also. All you need is to be cautious about w...
^^^^
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: ACTUAL_EXPERIENCE[1]
Message: Use simply 'fact'.
Suggestion: fact
...ly and constructively. Try to reach the actual fact and then take the action accordingly. B...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, if, may, so, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 2235.4752809 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 268.0 442.535393258 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6828358209 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65647654793 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533582089552 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 704.065955056 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.190628487 60.3974514979 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.8235294118 118.986275619 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7647058824 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88235294118 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254025857904 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916765173222 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544449712937 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165964151762 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525741550179 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 14.1392134831 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 48.8420337079 150% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 12.1743820225 56% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 12.1639044944 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 100.480337079 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.7820224719 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.