Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Since we are living in ever-shifting world which experiences unprecedented events, some people believe that our knowledge regarding to every field may be inaccurate. Although the role of advancement in science and technology in citing that some conclusion from the past experiments were wrong is undeniable, I mostly disagree with this idea that all of our information might be erroneous because of two reasons.
First of all, the human beings and scientists are owned their new theories to the past founding. Many of the novel theories are based on the results of experiments that prior researches have done. It is possible that in a few cases some of their results are not compatible with each other however their roles are supplementary. For example, agricultural researchers have tested a chemical pesticide in England to kill the bugs successfully but the results of their research is not effective for the other type of the bugs in Africa. Indeed, their work somehow help the academic people in Africa to avoid making mistakes and manipulating wrong instructions in testing their experiments. As a good result, the base of the researches are the same and they only save time and money through reducing errors.
Secondly, many of our historical and literary information have been stable and unchanged even after many hundred years. Although new discoveries have helped us to broad the knowledge regarding our ancestors, they were not only antithetical but also complementary and would be able to inform unparalleled view points regarding to the societies' issues and lifestyles in the past. For example, compromising style in art science is one of the considerable inventions which have been introduced after scientists put Kwangchow 's painting besides one of his apprentices' works- which have been found after one hundred years- and figured out that some of their art pieces were responds to each other. In fact, they have an unique conversation through their paintings. The above example illustrates the importance of knowing our ancient history and its value.
Of course some some argue that through the advancements in technology, many conclusions have been proven wrong, however I want to mention that some dubious and skeptical theories have been proven right by inventing spaceships such as turning Earth around itself and the sun. In conclusion, every piece of information that we have is practical in various aspects.Some of them help us to prevent remaking mistakes and doing exuberant and time-consuming processes again. Further, some of old knowledge pertinent to history are priceless and at last I think that science is a peace of a big enigmatic puzzle which would be able to complete by putting old and new information together.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fter scientists put Kwangchow s painting besides one of his apprentices works- wh...
^^
Line 3, column 713, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ponds to each other. In fact, they have an unique conversation through their paint...
^^
Line 4, column 11, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: some
...ient history and its value. Of course some some argue that through the advancements in ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 363, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Some
...we have is practical in various aspects.Some of them help us to prevent remaking mis...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, of course, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2311.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 443.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21670428894 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92745977581 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539503386005 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.1722927705 60.3974514979 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.4375 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6875 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.21951772744 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135454005312 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044493053718 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419018596124 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926222794413 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439767091307 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.