Claim: the best way to understand a character of a society is to examine the character of the man and woman that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society’s highest ideals.
Every society consists of certain ethics and principles, notwithstanding the extent of universal ideas, and often heroes of the particular society are thought to be figures that reflect the social ideals. Thus it shall be reasonable to conclude that heroes as well as role models can be a proper element in evaluating the characteristics of a society. However, this essay reveals that such figures may vary and even contradict to one another according to the given context, so that examining a society only being informed by its representative figures might cause a misleading result.
Admittedly, canonized figures that are proudly introduced as the symbol of a society are likely to illuminate its idiosyncrasy, such as Mozart in Austria, Abraham Lincoln in the U.S.A, Kafka in Czech, and so on. These figures not only reveal the driving force of a community, but a collective personality formed through geographical, political, and cultural factors. Thus it may seem largely plausible that heroes explain most of the country.
Nevertheless, because of the fact that such role models not only represent the highest ideals but also the vulgarity or shallow desire shared among the public, such figures may compete with one another and it might be extremely difficult to discern between or make priority among the many figures. For instance, President Trump, the former CEO and a billionaire in business, had been admired by numerous groups of people so that even many children who have not much to do with financial engagement picked Trump as their role models. The main factor of the admiration was based on the mere fact that he had accumulated wealth and prosperity, even though the way he had gained them was not as moral as it was supposed to be. That is, heroes and role models show both sides of the society, one as the idealistic character and the other as the fancy villain.
Furthermore, as the borderline that distinguishes countries has become more dim than before, nowadays heroes and role models are being widely shared among several societies. For instance, the doomed pop star Michael Jordan may be well recognized throughout the whole world, nevertheless the specific ideas and meanings of this figurative symbol may be disparate. In the African region, Michael Jordan is deemed to be the one who is respected for his origins and racial characteristics, while in the United States, he is considered to be the genius of the sports world. Thus, only by looking at the single figures without any context and background knowledge of the society won’t reveal the ethics but even mislead people with erroneous impressions.
The conclusion now stands that heroes and role models can become the symbol of a society at times when revealing its tenets, while at other times they may adversely confuse the people in characterizing certain societies. It is therefore important to consider the specific circumstances that lie behind the individual figures when evaluating a society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...figures that reflect the social ideals. Thus it shall be reasonable to conclude that...
^^^^
Line 2, column 184, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
... in Austria, Abraham Lincoln in the U.S.A, Kafka in Czech, and so on. These figur...
^
Line 2, column 369, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...hical, political, and cultural factors. Thus it may seem largely plausible that hero...
^^^^
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...n most of the country. Nevertheless, because of the fact that such role models not only represent the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2512.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 488.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14754098361 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85191428283 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52868852459 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 808.2 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.3225533434 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.0 118.986275619 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 23.4991977007 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.21951772744 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257304728772 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835078916265 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693466057159 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147353249239 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540590610803 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 14.1392134831 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 48.8420337079 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.38706741573 117% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.