Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.
We humans crave for direction and role models for our utopian desires. The definition of utopia is differentiable for everyone. Certainly, studying about the choice of role models for a population reveals a lot about its mindset. Perhaps, copious information that is revealed by the choice of role models is indeed enough to judge the character of a general population.
Narendra Modi, prime minister of India is instilling in the minds of the populace a retreat from democracy with his right-wing ideology. So far, a myriad of people respect his ideology and the young generation has made him an epitome of what the role of prime minister should be. People are supporting him, no matter the damge and tumult caused by his actions such as the temple-mosque dispute has inflamed the fight on religious grounds. Belligerent youngsters have already caused much damage and clearly, the influence of role model - Modi, is highly significant. Therefore, the choice of role model is a key factor in determining the mentality and character of the nation.
Nietzsche, one of the greatest german philosopher has had a very strong impact on his readers. One of the most prominent name who read his work and idealized him was Hilter. Hilter's ideal was Nietzche and his work pushed him towards anarchy. therefore the influence our role model may have on us is too ineffable. Surely, the highest ideals are revealed by our role models and we as a fanatic follow them to create our character, hence, choice of role model certainly reveals a lot about the character of a person and taking this influence of role model over horde, the character of a society.
The decision regarding the people's choice of role model revealing the character of a society logic may sometimes not be the benchmark method because it largely depends on the choice we make. Although historical instances reflect the human nature for practically worshipping the ideals, therefore people may sometimes make a different choice in that case the claim fails but for a majority of scenarios, the claims hold true.
To conclude the claim and the reason both are based on a very general pattern established about human nature over a long period of time, Hence the approach described in the claim is indeed the best in the majority of cases.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 243, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...nd his work pushed him towards anarchy. therefore the influence our role model may have o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 243, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: therefore,
...nd his work pushed him towards anarchy. therefore the influence our role model may have o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 123, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ablished about human nature over a long period of time, Hence the approach described in the cl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...deed the best in the majority of cases.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, regarding, so, still, therefore, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97409326425 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70237050046 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531088082902 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1067640417 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.941176471 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7058823529 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58823529412 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296198396739 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880777943452 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844924307315 0.0758088955206 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147620955752 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575658111055 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.