Claim The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models Reason Heroes and role models reveal a society s highest ideals Write a response in whic

Essay topics:

Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.

Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

The speaker claims that to understand the character of a society one should examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models because they reveal a society's highest ideals. I mostly disagree with this claim for some reasons.

First of all, the primary reason behind my opinion is not all the people of a society have the same character like their role models. To illustrate the idea an example can be given. Suppose a role model of a society is a good businessman who has achieved a lot of success in a very short time. It is not necessary that most of the people of that society possess the quality of being a good businessman. He might have achieved the success by his own hard work. Perhaps the nation he belongs does not have a stable environment for conducting business. So most of the people do not feel safe to have a career in that field. So, their roll model does not represent the character of that society.

Secondly, I hold my opinion for another reason which is, the way a man or a woman who is a national hero presents themselves in front of the public, is not always the true character of themselves. People who are public figure often potray themselves as an ideal person from all sides. But in reality they might not be like that. It has been proved from different scandals. From outside, it may seem like all the people have the ideal qualities like their role model but in reality their role model may have falsely represented them in front of everyone. So metimes people who do not come in front of people are the ones who do all the good works to help a society.
However, in some cases the opposite can be true. For example, in India people made Sachin Tendulkar their role model which implies that most of the people prefer cricket more than any other games. This is actually true for Indian people. Most of them are blind followers of cricket and cricketers which is evident from the excitement they show in the cricket stadium during any match of India.
To sum up, it can be said that not everytime the role models represnts the character of a society. Most of the people like the personality of their role models but do not prefer to be like them by doing all the hard work.

Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-03 Zahid6400 66 view
2024-01-26 LauraTing 58 view
2023-09-25 Isolus 83 view
2023-08-16 wopona8219 66 view
2023-08-05 rickxiangx 83 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user RzRizvi :


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'societys the highest'.
Suggestion: societys the highest
...r its role models because they reveal a societys highest ideals. I mostly disagree with this cla...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, first of all, in some cases, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1847.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 414.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.461352657 5.05705443957 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32275359254 2.79657885939 83% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45652173913 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.0 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.1561744085 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9545454545 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13636363636 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302779903866 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825841331333 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145852651157 0.0758088955206 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212643435585 0.150359130593 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.197138839206 0.0667264976115 295% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 14.1392134831 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 48.8420337079 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 12.1743820225 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 12.1639044944 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.