Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Although some people believe that character of a society is best understood by inspecting the individual character of men and women that society considers as its role models, I believe that heros do not represent the character of entire society.
Many people are considered to be heros after their achievement inspite of strong opposition from society. For example Gandhi is called "Father of Nation" in India. He was the leader who guided India towards independence through non violence. Majority of society did not have faith in obtaining freedom through non violence movements. However, despite the strong opposition from majority of people Ghandhi continued to stick to his principles and believes. Now he is considered to be role model in our society though majority of people have conflicting openions.
Similarly, this is the case in scientific studies. When Galilio promulgamated that eart is not the center of universe and it rotates around the Sun, he was considered as an apostate. He also faced strong opposition from society. But, after his theory proven to be true he is wildly celebrated.
Movie actors are another example of set of people widely celebrated and followed by the society. Most of these actors are hailed for their acting in the movie not for their original character. They could be totally diffrent from what they are portreyed in the movies. So, based on the role models we cannot generalize the entire society.
Role models might represent majority of traits in the society but society is much more diverse and different from it's heroes. They are individual entities and we cannot understand the entire society just by analyzing their character.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, similarly, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 273.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22710622711 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74045067565 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542124542125 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2485899918 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9411764706 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0588235294 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.94117647059 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253265112833 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689357963639 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110117447487 0.0758088955206 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162923106865 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153440745731 0.0667264976115 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.