In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Although, some people believe that development is mainly bolstered by having similar openion among people, I believe that discssions having opposing views is equally essential. If you consider progress as a coin then critic and support are its two faces. Both are equally essential for progress. Therefor, one should not belittle opposing views.
First, to illustrate the importance of having opposing views I would like to take class room as a scenario. If students agree to everthing that professor teaches then classrooms would not be interactive and it limits the intellectual growth of students. Instead, if a students starts to question the experiment, formulae or any thing that teacher has taught, then teacher might take few more examples or facts to illustrate why an experiment outcome is certain or how a mathematical formula can be proved. Then student will have better understanding of subject and it is tend to remain in his memory for longer time.
In addition to this we can take some more examples to emphasize the significance of contrasting points of view. For instance, a company is starting a new project and it has made several teams and it has provided guidelines to implement it. Team consists of variety of people and there will be different openions among them. I such cases, tech lead or manager should give equal importance to both supporting and opposing views. Because, may be the current way of implementation is wrong or is not feasible and critics of this discussion might have better plans to carry out the project. When people have opposing views, more question will arise and one will start looking from broader perspective. Many facts will be taken into account while evaluating the success of a project.
Finally, if there is no one to object project or mission then it might become complete failure. For example, a space research organization is planning to launch a new satellite. Current implementation involves many flaws. But management believes everything is perfect and it is going to be a major success. Organization has put lot of money in this project and it is been working on it since several years. clearly, if no one dare to bring flaws of this mission to management's notice, then plan is going to be fiasco and not just waste of money but waste of all the efforts that been put from several years. Instead, if there is contrasting views in each stage of development then more care will be taken to consider which would be the best way of implementation.
In summary, I would like to say that it is always good to have contrasting views in any situation. If we are supporting a particular view, then we can think and act in a way to prove why opposing view is not valid. On the other hand, if we cannot prove our points, then we would have learnt a lesson which we can adopt in future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
...to question the experiment, formulae or any thing that teacher has taught, then teacher m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 572, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...tter understanding of subject and it is tend to remain in his memory for longer time...
^^^^
Line 7, column 408, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Clearly
...been working on it since several years. clearly, if no one dare to bring flaws of this ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 621, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are contrasting views'?
Suggestion: there are contrasting views
...een put from several years. Instead, if there is contrasting views in each stage of development then more ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 320, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...have learnt a lesson which we can adopt in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, look, may, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2362.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 489.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83026584867 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75107603236 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498977505112 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.3227218152 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.48 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.56 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15167257851 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416507649066 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392039996594 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867233875971 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356230244077 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.