In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The topic brings into light a controversial issue of whether a progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting point of views or not. Indisputably, various contrasting point of view makes the progress more flawless and more reliable. Nevertheless, it also sometimes lead to a dispute and thus hold back from the progress. While some may argue that, they fully disagree with the statement, I personally strongly agree with the statement. In my essay, I will elucidate congruous reasoning to support my claims.
First of all, discussion is a very important thing for coming into a decision about any dispute or any topic. But if this discussion held among the people who preserve same point of view, then most of the time is becomes futile. For example, having a discussion among the people with contrasting point of view, helps to find out the flaws of any topic. In that case, various people give various opinions and thus people think about the topic for more time and come to a final decision. It leads the discussion to a more clear investigation for searching the flaws and as a result all of the flaws can be found. Therefore, the hidden flaws of the topic reveal and the discussion become fruitful. Thus, the above example illustrates that, in order to make a progress it requires a discussion among the people, who have contrasting point of views.
Moreover, discussion among the people with contrasting point of views makes the basement of any topic stronger and any final decision about a topic more reliable. It can make a discussion more precise and the program of the discussion can be succeeded. For example, a friend of mine, let’s call him John for anonymity. He had an IT farm. He had many consultants who helped him in various decision making about any topic. Most of the time, the consultants had contrasting point of views. It helped John for making decisions about any problem. As a result, John’s farm thrived within a very short time, which had been possible only because of the discussion among the people with contrasting point of views. The above example illustrates that, discussion among people with contrasting point of views helps to make decision about anything and it helps to get success.
However, the general saying goes, “Every coin has two sides”. My position regarding this issue also has its own pros and cons. It is incontrovertible that, sometimes too much argument and contrasting point of views lead to a discord and make the situation more complex. It can make the discussion in a vain. Nevertheless, sometimes it makes complex situation, but if one can pacify the people and use this discord into a positive way so that, the discussion will be more fruitful. So, the above discussion illustrates that, the importance of contrasting views cannot be denied. Thus the discussion among the people with contrasting point of views should not be discouraged.
In a nutshell, by using the above mentioned substantiation, we can clearly say that, discussion among the people with contrasting point of views is very is very important. Nonetheless, it has some demerits, it is undeniable that, discussion among the various people with contrasting point of views is very much helpful for progress.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
... light a controversial issue of whether a progress requires discussion among people who ha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 581, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...for searching the flaws and as a result all of the flaws can be found. Therefore, the hidd...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 332, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...s;s call him John for anonymity. He had an IT farm. He had many consultants who helpe...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 338, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'farms'?
Suggestion: farms
...ll him John for anonymity. He had an IT farm. He had many consultants who helped him...
^^^^
Line 13, column 589, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... of contrasting views cannot be denied. Thus the discussion among the people with co...
^^^^
Line 17, column 146, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'is very'.
Suggestion: is very
... people with contrasting point of views is very is very important. Nonetheless, it has some dem...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2745.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 543.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05524861878 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85273395585 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.397790055249 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 836.1 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6070106272 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342491126129 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110329208005 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077885174208 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228720047889 0.150359130593 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321768778145 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.