In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Progress in society, in every aspect, be it governance, introducing a innovative process in a manufacturing process, bringing new curriculum in an institution, should go through deliberation among people with contrasting point of view. It's by listening to the opposition in governance, we can sustain democracy in our society. The opposing ideas in a manifacturing plant might be coming from a more insightful individual who might be able to provide guidance in making proper tuning in the processes thus making it efficient and keep the processes in check so that it doesn't bring bad effects.
It's only by deliberation that we can understand each other's point of view. A country going through massive industrialization might be energy hungry and a government may introduce plans for nuclear plants and there might be proponents of not using a nuclear plant because of its harmful wastes. Now such a bill may get passed by a government with stringer number of support groups, but it's equally important to understand the oppositions, as there might be other cleaner energy sources available at the country's expense that can be utilized without risking any more fukushima-daiichi incident. At the same time, a nuclear reactor might be more efficient and reasonable to build taking into consideration of the proper management of the nuclear waste. Such ideas are always debatable and the outcome should do betterment to the society as a whole.
Conflicting ideas could co-exist as long as they respect each other. Listening to the other side of the story is equally important as to let others know our point of view. When Albert Einstein introduced the idea of photons, a quantified light energy packet, it was in conflict with the accepted idea of light energy being continuous and in the form of electromagnetic waves. Yet, photon supported all the fundamentals of an electromagnetic wave, thus obliterating the separation in equivalence. Such ideas can only be accepted when there is discussion among the groups with opposing ideas and proper validation supporting one's idea is presented. And once again it supports the existance of conflicting ideas and yet perfectly in resonance.
Keeping distance does not resolve issues between conflicting parties. For making progress, in any society, opposing voice needs to be heard and taken into account, as, for every solution or process decided to bring progress in a society can be made better. Progress is a continuous process and with discussion among people with conflicting point of view, it can be made for the betterment of everyone.
One thing to remember, not all point of view are for good or for improvement of existing processes or for bringing new innovations. Of course, in any society or government or any public or private institution, there would be nuances in processes; thus it cannot be equated among all institutions for similar problems. A public transportation problem might seem similar with the privately held institution's employees commute, yet the resolution of such problems may take a totally different approach.
It's unfortunate and yet needs to be accepted that there would be obnoxious people who would try to bring vile ideas and would try to make a system corrupt. We have to have such mechanism to refine such discussion and the participants, so that faulty ideas and unwanted nuisances are thwarted.
Thus it's very important to pay heed to the opposing point of views and understand what is causing the conflict and have proper mechanism to bring such people into a platform to deliberate among themselves to come to a consensus. That's how we can make progress in any society or in every aspect of our life.
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve. 62
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 58
- In order for any work of art — for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song — to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain you 50
- Young minds should be guided to achieve worthy goals, as goals are inherently selfish. 50
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
...y aspect, be it governance, introducing a innovative process in a manufacturing p...
Line 1, column 569, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
... keep the processes in check so that it doesnt bring bad effects. Its only by deli...
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
... and unwanted nuisances are thwarted. Thus its very important to pay heed to the o...
Line 13, column 230, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...mong themselves to come to a consensus. Thats how we can make progress in any society...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, thus, as to, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 88.0 58.6224719101 150% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3100.0 2235.4752809 139% => OK
No of words: 604.0 442.535393258 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13245033113 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95746018188 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00750627018 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453642384106 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 972.9 704.065955056 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7775947902 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.166666667 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.21951772744 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137868560594 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467037968788 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505586954282 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0833388988455 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358767111474 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 100.480337079 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.