Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the

Essay topics:

Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.

Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

For any society to thrive, business, politics, education and government has to work in unison and bettering the processes in each of these constituents should be the goal to better the lives of the citizen. Better the working of these pillers, better the society as a whole. Mismanagement in any system will create chaos and will hamper the other processes in their smooth executions. It's very important that to maintain the stability of any of these enterprises, those in power steps down to usher in new changes and new ideas with the new person taking the chair.
Five years of time is a good enough time for any candidate to bring fruitful change to the processes to make it better and proceed it to a better stage. With renewal of terms or reelecting the same person reflects clinging on to the same expectations and the aversion to new changes. For any society to progress, it's important to continuously progress towards the future and bring new changes that better the lives of the citizen. Any stagnating society cannot sustain the future growth and expectations of its people. Those in power has to have the virtues, vigor and ethics to support the growth of the system. With continuous terms, the same work may drain the energy of the persons in power, there by, making the system loose enthusiasm to progress in new directions. It's worth mentioning that doesn't matter what, every mind needs implementation of newer ideas to keep interest in whatever they are doing. If the enterprise has limitations on its resources, the same mind may see the work as repetitive and get bogged down by the similar work and thus demotivate the whole organisation. Say, for example, the CEO of a business has the background of agriculture and is very imaginative in his ideas to incorporate newer processes to better the produce, but for the business to continue to grow, it has to maintain the supply chain and warehouse management, the dynamics of the market and demands in the year around and not to mention tech savvyness. Now, considering the penetration of technology in every aspect of life, if the head of an organisation prefers to maintain the old school methods, the business will not be able to survive the competetion feom its peers. It needs a fresh mind to usher in changes to bring new ideas and processes to grow the business.
Also, the same person holding the power may bring unethical practices in the organization. We know power is something that diverts most mind, if not all. To keep the systems in check from such misappropriation, thus, change in power is needed or at the least, alternating the persons holding the power of execution. Such examples are rampant in the political systems, where any person staying in power for more that five years, has been seen to drag the system down to lesser productivity. Every person has different political inclination and it's not possible to address every such expectation, but alternating powers maintain the balance in the society. Every ideology in a politica system has it's own propaganda which reflects some citizens view and expectations. Thus rotation in the power would address the issues that might have been ignored by the other political party. Although, it's necessary that statesmanship should be beyond politics, beyond color, creed, ethnicity, but the reality is far from the ideal. Hence such a change in power is a mandate for a florishing society.
Another point to mention is that, even if a person is doing good to the system, there will always be some idea or an individual who can make the process even better. Forwarding the baton to better the organization requires someone with such enthusiasm and vigor to continue to run with the zeal. Reimagin‌ing the education system to provide for the nascent minds, need fresh ideas and the one who is in command to bring such a change should have the freshness in such ideas, doesn't matter if the changes are radical. Not all radical ideas are bad; Any new change that alters the system and leaps it forward can be called radical and is alwasy a need to step ahead to the future.
Although, sometimes there might not be such candidature after one's five year tenure to replace one in power and in such a case such exception to continue with the same person is necessary rather than replacing the leadership with an inefficient person. Such a cases calls for not so hard and fast rule, so that the system is flexible enough to maintain its status quo and doesn't deteriorate if it lack ideas to grow ahead.
Hence, the reason is definitely in agreement with the claim and has my support to bring new leadership every five years keeping in mind that, it should be flexible to continue with the same leadership if it needs so. Such a judgement requires the board to have the credibility, ethics and magnanimity to choose a leader among themselves, if it's not the common people who are the ones choosing the leader among the leadership.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 436, Rule ID: OF_ANY_OF[1]
Message: Consider simply using 'of' instead.
Suggestion: of
...mportant that to maintain the stability of any of these enterprises, those in power steps...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 799, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...w directions. Its worth mentioning that doesnt matter what, every mind needs implement...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 735, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
... its own propaganda which reflects some citizens view and expectations. Thus rotation in...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 767, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ts some citizens view and expectations. Thus rotation in the power would address the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1019, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... but the reality is far from the ideal. Hence such a change in power is a mandate for...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 476, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...hould have the freshness in such ideas, doesnt matter if the changes are radical. Not ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 600, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'forwards'?
Suggestion: forwards
...nge that alters the system and leaps it forward can be called radical and is alwasy a n...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ere might not be such candidature after ones five year tenure to replace one in powe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e enough to maintain its status quo and doesnt deteriorate if it lack ideas to grow ah...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lacks'?
Suggestion: lacks
...status quo and doesnt deteriorate if it lack ideas to grow ahead. Hence, the reaso...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, thus, as to, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 33.0 14.8657303371 222% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 125.0 58.6224719101 213% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4109.0 2235.4752809 184% => OK
No of words: 853.0 442.535393258 193% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81711606096 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.40427272933 4.55969084622 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6854859761 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 351.0 215.323595506 163% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.411488862837 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1298.7 704.065955056 184% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2270365117 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.40625 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.65625 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.71875 5.21951772744 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184292894034 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514008432056 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463305583422 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104811049671 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470939151798 0.0667264976115 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 175.0 100.480337079 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.