Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre

Essay topics:

Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.

Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

Learning is the cumulative aggregation of agrements in understangin and disagrements. Knowledge is omnipresent and with rationalization by arguments, knowledge gets assimilated into us as learning. With intution and counter intuitive experiences we evolve and thus garner new learning. Mere acceptance to people's view isn't a good proponent of learning. It's by chanllenge and questioning the norm, we learn the best and overcome inhibition.

If Gallelio were to conform to people whose view were that the sun rotates around the earth, we might have had the wrong understanging for a long long time until enough scientific improvements were made to prove it otherwise. It's by continuous quest of the inquisitive mind to question the accepted theories, that makes newer innovations and discoveries. Conflicting ideas don't have to be alien to each other; rather such ideologists should have a platform to debate and with rigorous deliberation, newer ideas can come into fruition or can improve on an existing idea. Disagreements could bring newer paths to understand and learn. Pampering with agreements may lead a generation to become sycophants; a trait that has become more and more visible with the introduction of social networking - more and more people are now running after how likeable they are and how many appreciating notes they received on instagram or if the followers increased on twitter.

Also, the greatest of the leaders are those who are accepting to all the people that he's leading to. A great leader or a great statesman needs to stand by his followers and yet pay heed and upheld the rights of his opposition. Consider a constitution, where there are no oppositions; every possible bill will be passed without contention - every violation of human rights will be accepted with an affirming nod. A better society depends on a strong opposition in the council or the governing body. A contradicting proposition could be counter intuitive and yet bring out the fault in a process and better the overall effect. Consider the soviet submarine commander who was misinformed about an attak and was asked to fire an atomic missile and with careful questioning and counter-arguing, figured out the wrong interpretation of the scrambled message. He is widely regarded as one who stopped the world from experiencing a neuclear war. If it were mere acceptance of one's superior, we might not be existing today.

While, disagreements could, at times, heart our feelings and can inhibit the nascent minds, it's necessary to bring everyone into careful participation in debates. It's by such guided practice, youger and fledgeling minds can strengthen and stay strong when faced with adversity. Nodding to every arguments, rather makes a person inept to take decision at the time of urgency. Overly accepting nature degenerates a mind and makes one socially inept as we cannot cope with disagreements.

Although, it's equally important to understand the state of one's mind and not get into contention with persons with anxiety disorders or a person with weaker mind. Arguments could be at one's dismay when dealing with such persons. We must understand that arguments are for healthier discussion and not bullying. It can do humongous harm to a softer mind and can flinch one and wrap into the cocoon of intovertedness.

Hence, we should encourage a healthier combination of agreements and disagreements. Disagreements should not be to bully a person and agreements are not to be obsequious. The benefit od the society and all of us are in the questioning and debating and disagreemtns and with proper motivations, may be with some amount of nod of aggrying views.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 319, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...arning. Mere acceptance to peoples view isnt a good proponent of learning. Its by ch...
^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: long
... have had the wrong understanging for a long long time until enough scientific improvemen...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ions and discoveries. Conflicting ideas dont have to be alien to each other; rather ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the followers increased on twitter. Also, the greatest of the leaders are th...
^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: he's
...ho are accepting to all the people that hes leading to. A great leader or a great s...
^^^
Line 5, column 971, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...lear war. If it were mere acceptance of ones superior, we might not be existing toda...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s we cannot cope with disagreements. Although, its equally important to under...
^^
Line 9, column 62, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ly important to understand the state of ones mind and not get into contention with p...
^^^^
Line 9, column 188, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...with weaker mind. Arguments could be at ones dismay when dealing with such persons. ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, so, then, thus, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 40.0 14.8657303371 269% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3079.0 2235.4752809 138% => OK
No of words: 593.0 442.535393258 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19224283305 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93473315629 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08416595782 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 311.0 215.323595506 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524451939292 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 964.8 704.065955056 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5293140527 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.172413793 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4482758621 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.48275862069 5.21951772744 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146296285048 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398121230562 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342069566405 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775871646161 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346094331727 0.0667264976115 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 166.0 100.480337079 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.