Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre

Essay topics:

Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.

Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

Learning is a constant process throughout the life. Starting from the birth till the end of the life, at every stage we are learning. Some people are rigorous learner, while some are not but more or less everybody is learning throughout the life is true. Although, the contentious conversation is bad for a while, and the noisy debates, in my opinion, most of the time It results in something fruitful or good. The given claim says we learn from the people who share the same thinking or view as ours and to support this they have given a reason that disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. However, I personally belive that, hearing an opposite view-point can cause no real harm as well as it helps to either strengthen our own view or clearing our view whether its wrong or right.

One good example is support this Idea, If we have one nickle and our friend also have one nickle if we exchange the nickle We still have the same amount of mony. However If we have two different thoughts and we share it with each other we then have two different thoughts. Whether or not we agree with that thought at least we come to know the second thought is exist and ultimately our mind look for the more information about the second thought heare from the second person. But, If we never listen to any opposite view we generally fail to understand the other side of the coin.

Watching a movie with an opposite view-point or reading a book not necessarily results in disagreement, but, helps to increase our knowledge.

Ultimately, all the examples stated above are support the Idea that we should also here the opposite viewpoint. Every time our own view-point is not necessarily substantially true. When we disagree with something we actually go on reading or listening about it to prove either ourself correct or other view is wrong. So overall we actually learn more and not inhibit learning.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... We still have the same amount of mony. However If we have two different thoughts and w...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
...er we then have two different thoughts. Whether or not we agree with that thought at least we ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...t we come to know the second thought is exist and ultimately our mind look for the mo...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, look, second, so, still, then, well, while, at least, as well as, in my opinion, more or less

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 334.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73952095808 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54838086691 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517964071856 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0812064416 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.533333333 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 5.21951772744 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311448907591 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107742883582 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832806741922 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178164344121 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923360594511 0.0667264976115 138% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 100.480337079 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.