In order for any work of art — for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song — to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain you

Essay topics:

In order for any work of art — for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song — to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Art is the expression of the self: the feelings, vision, understanding; either with reallife assiciations or abstrat ideas, colored with one's own idiosyncrasy. What is important to undestand is that every mind has different understanding and perspective to one idea or to any object. While it may seem judging an art with it's quality in comparison to others, brings out the real merit, the true merit lies on the eyes of the beholder in understanding the sometimes unexplained. Also, we need to understand art is a form of expression and it gets better, like other skills, with practice and maturity of thoughts. The visceral feelings of a fledgeling artist when reprimanded by the intelectuals for it's naivete, might get a future picaso or matisse, nip in the bud.
We human beings are inherently negative minded; whenever there is a vacant mind, there will be some thought that leads to negativity. Even prolonging a positive thought eventually leads to exhaution and brings negativity in mind. Now think about the judging a poem of a little kid by the behemoths and denounce it in front of that kid as being a solecism, would not just be rude, but it'll ingratiate fear in the budding poet that he or she is not good enough. It's utmost important to understand that constructive criticism does better to the humanity not the negative or destructive criticism. Naive form of art should be encouraged to do better and be given direction as to what needs to be done to make it better; and by better, it means better to the artist. For most people to understand a form of art, it requires similar mind set and the capacity to understant it. Someone with inclination towards writing may not necessarily find painting to be that much attractive. But does that reduce the merit of Henry Matisse? It is invariably true, that more people in the world know Pablo Picasso than the other exponent. It's unfortunate that sometimes money and the amount of promotion any form of art garners, dives it the edge compared to other form of art or to one artist within the same form of art. To everyone's surprise, the only grief one artist can have, in most cases, is the inability to support the livelihood due to the apparent lesser merit in his art and the little monetary gains it fetches. Though most are oblivious of the criticism and continues their love and faith in art. In such case, it's the inability of most of the people and not the merit, that plunges an artist and the art into darkness.
To understand any art, the society needs to be all encompassing in accepting and relishing every form of art. Critiques are always needed, but to better the skill of expression, not to associate marks or merit to one and the other. France is one country which boasts such a cultural motley and continues to be a proponent in art: be it the engineering marvel, Eiffel Tower, or the sculptures and arts in the Louvre.
It's true that a beginner in film production will not have that expertise an established one has. It's the experience that keeps honing the skills and making it a better presentation. As they say, if one pours one's heart out, any art will reach to every individual's heart. Thus, it's important to note that mere association of merit based on the comparison of art is not a qualified process as art can seldom be quantified. Art needs the sense and not just the intake through the sensory organs to feel it. It doesn't need everyone to understand to get it's merit. It mostly needs another individual to really understand it. That will be more than enough to any artist to bolster the faith in his own form of art.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1608, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ir love and faith in art. In such case, its the inability of most of the people and...
^^^
Line 4, column 98, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
... that expertise an established one has. Its the experience that keeps honing the sk...
^^^
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...presentation. As they say, if one pours ones heart out, any art will reach to every ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 253, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... heart out, any art will reach to every individuals heart. Thus, its important to note that...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 508, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...rough the sensory organs to feel it. It doesnt need everyone to understand to get its ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 532, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'understand getting'.
Suggestion: understand getting
... to feel it. It doesnt need everyone to understand to get its merit. It mostly needs another indi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, really, so, thus, while, as to, in most cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 90.0 58.6224719101 154% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2975.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 638.0 442.535393258 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66300940439 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.02579962599 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70041408309 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 302.0 215.323595506 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473354231975 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 944.1 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1788887173 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.586206897 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.24137931034 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183522301771 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538415025423 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030655019279 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128756840338 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134961530502 0.0667264976115 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 100.480337079 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.