In order for any work of art — for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song — to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The art is nothing but the “expression of one’s feelings”. This statement has validity not only for the poets, sand artists, lyricists but also true for the painters, sculptures as well. The topic raises an issue whether any art form would be beneficial if it is lucid for the majority people. Although artists are willing to express their views in an articulate matter . However not all non-artists are able to imbibe their meaning. So I strongly agree that the artifacts should be such that most people can understand.
From the archaic times, the human has started to build various sign languages to express their views. If today, you see in old temples there are scrulptures which have the figures whith which the common people can easily relate. They have pictures of god, goddesses, animals etc. and so people easily connect with them. The main purpose of the art form is not only to show feelings but also disseminate the knowledge to the every individual who comes in contact with let’s say particular film. Let us take an example of the patriotic songs which were famous during the independence time like “Ae mere Vatan k logo”. They were famous because common man could grasp the inspiration and sense a feeling of patriotism when they listened to it. In the older days, movies were actually made to depict the social issues and spread awareness among the common people. The writings published in news papers and novels also engendered the great social and economical revolutions and galvanized people to fight for their rights, they were inflammatory letters and writings that were published in local news papers during the Independence time that gave people the strength and motivation to fight for the freedom. So it is required that the people for whom it is written, they should gain the knoiwledge from it and the purpose should suffice.
Furthermore, if the arts are prepared in such a way that people don’t understand it, people will get disinclined to them. Only the people who can understand these esoteric piece of art would go and buy the book and read it. If this is the case, then the artists would have less popularity and they would earn pittance. They won’t be able to reach the hearts of the people and that artist will be in economic crisis and eventually he won’t be able to publish his works due to dearth of money.
At the other hand, some people are fond of convoluted plots and wordings. At the same time, if all the art forms are simple then the artists would not have any chance of touting their knowledge. Like some great painters like Picasso made a simple yet mysterious painting “Monalisa” which is famous due to its complexity and mysterious nature. He has embellished his painting skills in that. Great poets like Rabindranath tagore has delineated the simple stories by use of difficult language still they are famous. However this doesn’t give a sufficient evidence to assert the claim that they shouldn’t write in a way that most people can understand.
In conclusion, it is true that the great artisan skills depicted by some great artists is quite well-known but in order to gain social and economical revolution, it should be written in understandble languages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...if it is lucid for the majority people. Although artists are willing to express their vi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 385, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ress their views in an articulate matter . However not all non-artists are able to...
^^
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...s their views in an articulate matter . However not all non-artists are able to imbibe ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 525, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...fficult language still they are famous. However this doesn't give a sufficient evi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, still, then, well, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2749.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 548.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01642335766 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83832613839 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75999143035 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507299270073 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 835.2 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6947194784 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.814814815 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2962962963 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.51851851852 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16914785452 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430292768541 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433909850467 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0884808664486 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463767862026 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.