Claim: Group assignments that students must work together to complete should replace a
substantial amount of traditional lecture-based instruction in college and university
courses.
Reason: It is vital for students to gain experience collaborating with peers to study a topic
and to achieve a common goal.
The claim to promote group assignments and replace a substantial amount of lecture-based instructions in colleges has its own merit and surely, there would be some people contending it. Group assignments promotes interpersonal communication, fostering of new ideas, encouragement to bring about radically innovative ideas. Although it is a must to have proper guidance to promote such environment in colleges and universities, else, there would be more nuisance than ideas in such group activities. keeping some amount of traditional lecture-based instructions would be helpful in clearing doubts from the more experienced professors or instructors and eventually help them achieve the intended goal.
It is of utmost importance that institutes encourage more and more communication among the peer students not just in the higher educational systems but from the kindergartens. We humans are social animals and we cannot live in seclusion; physical, emotional and intellectual need requires us to interact with fellow human beings. To keep up a healthy relationship, we ought to have proper social mores and that can only be promoted in the institutes where the greenhorns are ebullient in ideas and emotions and are looking for vent to express themselves. Such group engagements would give them the platform to share ideas with each others and at the same time enable to engage different members belonging to different ethnic groups, different cultures to collaborate and bring forth a motley of diversity. It is a no-brainer that, the sheer globalization has made the boundaries across a country bleaker day by day and every society can now see different ethnic group co-existing among them. To have a mutual understanding and friendliness, it is very important to maintain interpersonal communication. Colleges and universities can give the benefits to the fledgling students a new outlook of acceptance towards others.
At the same time, archiving a task that requires mammoth time investment and diverse knowledge in fields, requires people with expertise in different fields. No one person can be a master of all - all one can is a jack of all trades but master of none. To achieve a common goal requires such individual contributor, with their ideas booming in one aspect but nescient in other fields, to collaborate. This will enable them to garner cognizance in the other fields and will benefit the whole group by delving deep into problem solving: eventually bettering their analytical capabilities, knowledge in different fields, improving interpersonal communications and respect to each other.
Although the other side of the argument may give some insight that the guidance should be left to the more experienced faculties of the colleges to guide the students in achieving their goals. Here, we forget the most of the traditional classes cannot have enough time to cater to all the questions of the students and thus some students remain reluctant in future to ask for questions.
Thus, it is important to understand that communication is a real issue in our world today and to overcome such problem and better the skills in all the aspects in an institutes, they should promote group activities.
- Young minds should be guided to achieve worthy goals, as goals are inherently selfish. 50
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve. 62
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs. 58
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 62
- Claim: Group assignments that students must work together to complete should replace asubstantial amount of traditional lecture-based instruction in college and universitycourses.Reason: It is vital for students to gain experience collaborating with peers 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...ally innovative ideas. Although it is a must to have proper guidance to promote such en...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 500, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Keeping
...ce than ideas in such group activities. keeping some amount of traditional lecture-base...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'be'
Suggestion: be
...on can be a master of all - all one can is a jack of all trades but master of none...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nications and respect to each other. Although the other side of the argument may give...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 164, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an institute' or simply 'institutes'?
Suggestion: an institute; institutes
...better the skills in all the aspects in an institutes, they should promote group activities.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2715.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 509.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33398821218 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10580374727 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514734774067 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 850.5 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.983218701 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.833333333 118.986275619 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2777777778 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 5.21951772744 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186825126966 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056269548714 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522925726852 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993305319267 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631730604026 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 14.1392134831 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 48.8420337079 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.