Young minds should be guided to achieve worthy goals, as goals are inherently selfish.
We, human beings are goal driven. We live by hope to attain some goal in life. Thus bringing fulfillment to our heart and mind. To cherish such achievements, there has to be some gain in spirituality or it has to be materialistic. Whatever be it, every mind sets apart some goals, some dreams. And because of its self-fulfillment nature, it's somewhat selfish in nature - or is it? Again it circles back to the human nature of being goal driven. Everyone has a dream, a goal. Or at least everyone should be. If there's no purpose or goal, every mind is susceptible to negativity, evil-doing. So the emphasis should be on guiding a young mind to figure out the dreams and to dream about a good dream and pursue until attained, rather than waiting to dream a worthy dream.
Goal never remains the same for any individual. Particularly, for the young people, the mind is always in a disruptive mode, bringing radically divergent ideas; ideas that can curb the rules, ideas that can bring about exceptional change in our life. To guide such minds would be to hinder the ideas, to nip it in the bud. If gallileo were to follow the worthy goals set forth by the so called relics, we would still believe the sun rotating the earth. Elon Musk would work on bettering the internal combustion engine, instead of making an electric car that would prove it's point against the naysayers.
Also, it's worthy to note that no one ever continues to chase one goal. Goal changes as time passes. Something that's worthy today may not be worthy tomorrow. All that will remain is the sanguine mind brimming with confidence, that it did follow it's dream, no matter what. That itself will bolster the young minds to find a worthier goal and chase for it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 511, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...oal. Or at least everyone should be. If theres no purpose or goal, every mind is susce...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 104, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a disruptive mode" with adverb for "disruptive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...or the young people, the mind is always in a disruptive mode, bringing radically divergent ideas; id...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...prove its point against the naysayers. Also, its worthy to note that no one eve...
^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... Goal changes as time passes. Something thats worthy today may not be worthy tomorrow...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, still, thus, as to, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 307.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6319218241 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51468112969 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589576547231 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7748878523 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.7142857143 118.986275619 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.619047619 23.4991977007 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2380952381 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362410320655 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103389394467 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499419850276 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23156609553 0.150359130593 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778624832478 0.0667264976115 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 14.1392134831 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 48.8420337079 152% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 12.1743820225 53% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.98 12.1639044944 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 11.8971910112 38% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.