Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.
When it comes to the approach to understanding a society, some people advocate that outsiders should assign priority to the group the society regards as its heroes or role models. It is because citizens are inclined to attach the highest ideals to their heroes. While this reason has its merit, I am, to some degree, at odds with the claim and believe these charaters, which seem to be reflected by role models, are not comprehensive and sometimes biased. Therefore, researchers should also pay their attention to ordinary people to fully devlve a society.
To begin with, we have to recognize that heroes and public figures offer foreigners a great opportunity to explore some significant charaters of a group of people. Fo examples, George Washington, the father of the U.S. fully represents the values, such as freedom and , appraciated by Americans
However, the aformentioned statement hinges on an unsubstantiated assumption that people who have been chosen as role models can represent the whole population. This presumption is not always held for two reasons. First, even though as we have demonstrated above, heroes have embodies the dreams of a country, they usually turn a blind eye to the negative side of the society. These features even though are comtempted by the society are also deeply embedded into its genes. With the development of its economy and technology, the world has observed a series of heroes who have merged in the Chinese society. Chinese people praised them as technological heroes of the country contributing to the China’s technological domination in the world. On the contrary, in the summer of 2018, the sanction on ZTE, a Chinese communcation company, fully showed the lack of rule of law in this society.
Second, to serve some political and ideological purposes, heroes may be polished by the authority, which gives rise to a false image of the society. For instance, during the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquack, the national media in China were repeatly reporting the story of a man called Tan Qianqiu. He was described as a hero in the earthquack, since he was reported to protect two students sacrificing his life. What was ironic was that the whole story was forged by local officials aimming to create a person or figure to encourage the society. In such a circumstance, the claim is rendered questionable, because the charaters what heroes have reflected have been polished or even created by the government.
To summarize, as I have manifested above, examining heroes could reflect some dreamed values in one society, it is precititous to reach the conclusion that this is the best way to learn a society. This measure also has the potential to generate discrimiated or false imagination. If the outside world wants to gain a profound understanding of a society, not only need it to focus on these who are being admired, but also analyze the common citizens in that area.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...son has its merit, I am, to some degree, at odds with the claim and believe these...
^^
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...presents the values, such as freedom and , appraciated by Americans However, t...
^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s freedom and , appraciated by Americans However, the aformentioned statement hin...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, as for, for instance, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2446.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 483.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06418219462 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91188352061 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534161490683 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 792.0 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.651984473 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.3 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.15 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196614451936 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538326320375 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623305720933 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101735816179 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693467287201 0.0667264976115 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 100.480337079 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.