Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.
Society is the results of thousands of years of human civilization; it has been a force that encourages people to work together in order to find a common goal: an ideal situation in which everyone appreciates the co-existence. Society chooses those as their hero or role model who plays important role in order for the betterment of the society. I generally agree with the claim that we can understand much more about a society by examining the characteristics of those who society consider as its hero. However, in some circumstance, it would be unwise to reach a conclusion that the best way to understand a society is to understand its role model.
In the first place, society considers those as their hero who fight for the people without self-interest. For example, Nelson Mandela is considered as a role model leader not only of South Africa, but also of the world. He fought for the democracy in South Africa; fought for the people of South Africa. The principle on which Mr. Mandela based his life’s philosophy turned out to be the will of millions of South African. So, by examining Mandela’s characteristics, we can say that whole African society was against the racial segregation and social unjust. We can also speculate the political awareness of South African society at Mandela’s time.
In the second place, people are considered to be a hero when majority of the people in the society approve of their work and admire them for their contribution to the society. As a result, those heroes represent the view of the majority of the people on certain issue. So, it is worthwhile to examine the tendency of those role model to understand the views of the society. For example, Florence Nightingale, the founder of modern nursing, has inspired million of people around the world. Her altruistic act toward the benefit of the society earned her respect and praise of the people from all over the world. So, by analyzing her character, it can be inferred that the society at her time had begun to recognize the importance of selfless act and had developed a high sense of altruistic approach.
Finally, although a role model of a society represents the social awareness and people’s view on the current situations, there might be other characters of the society that we cannot always find in its heroes. The heroes of the society represent the views of a society only on the issue of communal interest. In order to understand true characters of a society one should go to the society and examine.
In conclusion, even though examining the attributes of a society’s role model always does not reveal true nature of the society, but in most of the cases, they can reflect the characters of the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this role' or 'those roles'?
Suggestion: this role; those roles
...s worthwhile to examine the tendency of those role model to understand the views of the so...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...founder of modern nursing, has inspired million of people around the world. Her altruis...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reflect the characters of the society.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in the first place, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2278.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 465.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89892473118 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8847071667 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45376344086 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 736.2 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3133639885 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.9 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411781071973 0.243740707755 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138933024511 0.0831039109588 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104263042386 0.0758088955206 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263554729573 0.150359130593 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123702331158 0.0667264976115 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.