Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals
Great names in various fields whether it is technology, politics or business tend to leave a very strong impression on the people of their society. Steve Jobs influence on the natives of silicon valley was huge, every second child in the Palo Alto area looked at him as a role model. But, motivation and character determination of society are two different things. In spite of role models and heroes influence on people of the society it can not be justified that, they can decide the character of society as a whole.
Idiosyncracy of role models is the cynosure, role models can be erratic and many of them work to maintain their semblance. Entrenching a perception about the character of society based on this semblance is not warranted. Michael Jackson contributed to the society with his altruistic deeds, but one can not neglect the drug abuse. Therefore, in a myriad of cases, role models do not show society's highest ideals.
Rather than relying on role models for character determination of society , more light must be thrown on history or trend - these factors can statistically tell more about society's character. Looking at the past robberies in a society or drawing conclusions about trend of economy or running surveys for preferences in a society can be better indicators. Colombian drug lord Pablo Escobar has without a doubt influenced colombian people, but his behaviour and character does reveal anything about people of colombia.
Role models are people. Spending more hours on work everyday can sometimes take a toll , although they are trying stand up to the people and do the right thing. Being a role model can be exhausting and examining the character of tired person cannot be warranted measure in determiningthe character of the population as a whole.
Exemplars can be very influential to the society, but they cannot be considered as a correct estimate in determining the character of the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty are two different things. In spite of role models and heroes influence on peo...
^^
Line 1, column 401, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ngs. In spite of role models and heroes influence on people of the society it ca...
^^
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'societys the highest'.
Suggestion: societys the highest
...yriad of cases, role models do not show societys highest ideals. Rather than relying on role ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s for character determination of society , more light must be thrown on history or...
^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty or drawing conclusions about trend of economy or running surveys for preferenc...
^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ators. Colombian drug lord Pablo Escobar has without a doubt influenced colombian...
^^
Line 7, column 53, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...are people. Spending more hours on work everyday can sometimes take a toll , although th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... work everyday can sometimes take a toll , although they are trying stand up to th...
^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ining the character of the society.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, second, so, therefore, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 319.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11912225705 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84198144464 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7610131848 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.866666667 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26666666667 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304590365029 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121238946795 0.0831039109588 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812972581275 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17621963476 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812991411 0.0667264976115 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.