Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.
It is indeed important but difficult to understand the character of a society as whole. A character itself is subjective, and can be classsified in multiple ways, and given it varies from person to person, understanding the character of society is arduous task. The author suggest an approach i.e., to analyze the character of the heros of the society, as these are the highest ideals for the society. One chooses an ideal or hero based on their aspirations. However, the aspirations and reality does not often coincide. One may chose and aspire to become like someone but practise completely different idoelogy. The most common example is of daydreamers, who aspire to become successful like many entreprenur or sportsperson who have worked tirelessly to achive success. The daydreamers keeps dreaming to become like them rather than working to horn their skill, and work hard to achive success like their heros.
Besides, the public display of one's character, especially of public figures, need not be the same in private life. Thus, analyzing the chracter of heros can be misleading if these selected role models are great at P.R., as public perception of their character will greatly vary from their real character. There is a long list where a completely different characterstics of these heros were discovered and the same people who use to idealized them, booed them.
Many a times heros are selected based on a spefic trait in them and society need not idealize thier complete character. This is often the case with sportstar or filmstar who are celebrated for their role specific reason, and people may not be really interested to become like them. Thus, analyzing the character of these heros and correlating them with the society's character will be errorneous.
Thus, the suggestion to analyze the character of heros of the society to understand the character of the society itself has several underlying assumption which seriously challenges the claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
... of society is arduous task. The author suggest an approach i.e., to analyze the charac...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 789, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'keep'.
Suggestion: keep
...ssly to achive success. The daydreamers keeps dreaming to become like them rather tha...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...os. Besides, the public display of ones character, especially of public figures...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, may, really, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 320.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1875 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77853800361 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.510159399 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.666666667 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263225096449 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991313792736 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982093555858 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197035341183 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849740918936 0.0667264976115 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.