Claim : The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of a men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
First of all, character of a person plays a cardinal role in assessment of a person and which reflects the attributes of a person whether to be considered as role model or not. So to examine character of a society the best way is to analyse the individuals of the society to which I mostly agree and to corroborate it with following reasons.
Starting with a positive side, heroes and role models are considered to be the highest ideals of the society which is true as we characterize a person upon their deeds. Society would always judge the deeds of an individual and after assessment one is characterized as a role model or a superhero. For instance, if a thief who is armed and wants to rob a bank manages to escapes with the money and a individual who risks his/her life and manages to catch the thief, in this case the individual could be characterized as a hero as his selfless deed helped to catch the thief who was running away with someone else’s property. After this incident everyone would praise the individual and would like to step forward against such crime as the individual did which would characterizes the person as a hero to many.
Though, the problem with the society is that they considers role model influenced by the fictious characters and undermine the real pith which characterizes one as a hero or a role model in real life. For instance, we are all familiar with captain America a fictious character who portrays a role of a superhero in movies and fights against evil who tries to harm the society, we all love the character and idolize him as hero but when a person in real life not in reel life fight against evil in the society is considered as duty as a human being and no credit is awarded to the individual for his good deed. So the problem with the society is that they compare a fictious character and a real life incident which eventually undermines whole case. Rather the person who does something good for the society should be touted and everyone would try their best to fight against evil in the society.
So to conclude, the society should give enough credit to the individuals who risk their lifes or does any kind of good deeds for the society and try not to emulate what happens in reel life but rather be a real life hero.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of a person whether to be considered as role model or not. So to examine charact...
^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'escape'.
Suggestion: escape
...rmed and wants to rob a bank manages to escapes with the money and a individual who ris...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...k manages to escapes with the money and a individual who risks his/her life and m...
^
Line 5, column 771, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'characterize'
Suggestion: characterize
...crime as the individual did which would characterizes the person as a hero to many. Though,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'consider'
Suggestion: consider
...e problem with the society is that they considers role model influenced by the fictious c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 750, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...which eventually undermines whole case. Rather the person who does something good for ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, for instance, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 412.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55582524272 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59800364927 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.415048543689 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 23.0359550562 161% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.9499500595 60.3974514979 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.636363636 118.986275619 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.4545454545 23.4991977007 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203409913987 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107958015661 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710276259881 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149805975387 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693692260375 0.0667264976115 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 14.1392134831 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 12.1743820225 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.76 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 11.2143820225 150% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.