In asserting that governments must ensure major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive is refer to author's parochial and is a kind of discrimination among small towns and big cities. But sometimes it can be true for instance when you talk about England the first thing comes in our mind is London or when we talk about Japan the firs thing appears in our mind is Tokyo, so these cities are famous in a country and should receive financial support but not more than other cities or even ignoring other cities in a country. It is proved that traditions are generated and preserved by small towns and villages and because of big cities throng and many people from different areas in a country come to major cities, one unique culture doesn't exist and a mixture of different cultures is visible. So it can be concluded that big cities have a mixture of many traditions.
Since all the people who live in a country, whether in big cities or small towns, have an equal rights for receiving financial support so that, the government should allocate equal financial support to all of the cities equally. More population in big cities with more problems forced government to consider more facilities for them beside paying attention to small cities.
A curios government who is for it's progresses start financial support from small towns and villages cause first traditions are originated there.
Nevertheless, I'm not totally agree with the author statement. Admittedly, major cities need more hospitals,universities, transport, shopping mall, wide street so that the government should allocate financial support to these cities more than small cities. As you know small towns and villages have less population and people's' expectation' level is less than big cities but most of the villagers are farmer and they need more attention from the government to export better nutrition food to the major cities.
Since it is unable to familiar most of the cities in a country, so major cities are the best cases for showing the characteristic of a country or society. Hence government must ensure that their major cities are under financial aid to have more.
Government should consider that all people in a country can not immigrate to major cities for thrive and they are in villages or smaller cities so it should consider financial aid to them and prepare for them more facilities that obscured them to immigrate to major cities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'firs'' or 'fir's'?
Suggestion: firs'; fir's
... London or when we talk about Japan the firs thing appears in our mind is Tokyo, so ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 759, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ome to major cities, one unique culture doesnt exist and a mixture of different cultur...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 203, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...uld allocate equal financial support to all of the cities equally. More population in big ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 3, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'curios'' or 'curio's'?
Suggestion: curios'; curio's
...de paying attention to small cities. A curios government who is for its progresses st...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 15, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...s are originated there. Nevertheless, Im not totally agree with the author state...
^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , universities
...ttedly, major cities need more hospitals,universities, transport, shopping mall, wide street ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...characteristic of a country or society. Hence government must ensure that their major...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, nevertheless, so, for instance, kind of, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2040.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 411.0 442.535393258 93% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96350364964 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6950555237 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.411192214112 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 638.1 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.4092590288 60.3974514979 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.923076923 118.986275619 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6153846154 23.4991977007 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35703360689 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155262999391 0.0831039109588 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0973808739497 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206052530394 0.150359130593 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070057055144 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 14.1392134831 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 11.8971910112 223% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 27.0 11.7820224719 229% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.