Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.
Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The author claims that the imagination overweighs the expertise. The writer further reasons, the illusion provides the freedom of thinking without the border to fulfill the missing of expertise. I fundamentally do not concur with this disposition. In what follows, I will list of arguments against this disposition and its supportive clue.
The first reason which cast doubt on the accuracy of the claim is the requirement of the employment. As a recently graduated student from the field of architecture of which the creativity and imagination are fundaments; during the jobs’ interviews, the considered field is my resume and the seeking object is my years of experiences instead of level of creativity or imagination. Or at the other fields of activity, the crucial item is the expertise, not the imagination. For instance, for an accountant does the skillful mind is required for the audit or the elusive mind? Or for a surgeon, does dexterous hands are required for the sophisticated and complicated operation or fanciful mind? The possible answer for these two inquiries is the skill and experience which indicates the priority of experience over the imagination.
However, the sentence of innovation and invention are occurred based on the imaginative mind could mislead us. Actually, this is a superficial sentence as put sole emphasis over the imagination as the only base of the innovation. Although all inventions occur for the sake of thought of the scientists which are out of the box; those thoughts are also based on the experiences and knowledge. A lucid example which gives adherence to my perspective is the invention of the plane. Did it invent by the imagination and daring of jumping off the cliff? Or Wright Brothers’ knowledge on the field of physics and mathematics ends to this invention. Indeed, the plane is appeared based on the Wright Brothers’ knowledge which considered in a trail of experiences until cause the existence of plate.
I also do not agree with the reason adduced by the author in which via the imagination the man-kind could go beyond the limits which could fill the missing of experience shortage. Even though, the illusion is illimitable; it requires a base and vision to shape. For instance, a civil engineer who does not have the experiment of participating in the project, how could imagine the process of work? Or a more detailed and tangible question, if he does not know how to work with the surveying camera, how he will imagine of using the camera for measuring and surveying the construction field? Therefore, there should be a base to give a frame for buildings the illusion. In addition, this framework is achievable by experience and knowledge.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned arguments enlighten the importance of the experiments over the imagination. Although, an individual could imagine very fancy situation; in the physical world and scope the experiences and skills have the first role.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 532, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'?
Suggestion: be
...or an accountant does the skillful mind is required for the audit or the elusive m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 35.0 12.9106741573 271% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2490.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 484.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14462809917 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07685906016 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493801652893 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 792.9 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.7178653063 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.36 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.04 5.21951772744 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188880512715 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529172670175 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463244415395 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101374691309 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256392692348 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.