It’s true that in the present age the media has infiltrated the lives of public figures to an extent that their private lives are no longer private. Even the actions of public figures outside their domain of work is scrutinized and reported. In this scenario it becomes hard to maintain a public image free from any accusations but it doesn’t mean one cannot be a living legend.
A public figure especially someone answerable to public at large cannot take all his actions which may seem just to one and all. Take the honourable president of the US Barack Obama for example, all his actions and decisions must not be taken solely by him. He is also a part of a system which collectively decides what is good for the country. Yet being the face of the country, it is him who bears the responsibility for anything that goes wrong. The opposition will always seek opportunities for criticizing his actions no matter how well intended they are and those criticisms are not always unadulterated when they reach the masses. The imperative, hence, lies with the people as well to be empathetic to the person they look up to and not blatantly believe what’s being served to them.
We have had several eminent scientists who lived their lives as legends and got even more adulation from the public posthumously. The eminent scientist from India Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam Azad was immensely respected throughout his career as a scientist and later as the President of India as well. The onus of public image lies with the person as well how well they manage to steer their lives away from controversies.
Indeed, the media scrutinizes public figures’ actions and not always reports them honestly to the public but we have had several examples of people who lived their lives as heroes. The history itself leaves the claim that that it is not possible for a society to regard a living person a hero unwarranted to say the least.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 217, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...es. The history itself leaves the claim that that it is not possible for a society to reg...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'honestly', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'well', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.205633802817 0.240241500013 86% => OK
Verbs: 0.152112676056 0.157235817809 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0901408450704 0.0880659088768 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.101408450704 0.0497285424764 204% => Less adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0704225352113 0.0444667217837 158% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.0957746478873 0.12292977631 78% => OK
Participles: 0.030985915493 0.0406280797675 76% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.59336920672 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0338028169014 0.030933414821 109% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.118309859155 0.0997080785238 119% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0140845070423 0.0249443105267 56% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0281690140845 0.0148568991511 190% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1921.0 2732.02544248 70% => OK
No of words: 334.0 452.878318584 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75149700599 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.329341317365 0.366273622748 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.212574850299 0.280924506359 76% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.134730538922 0.200843997647 67% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0988023952096 0.132149295362 75% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59336920672 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 219.290929204 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544910179641 0.48968727796 111% => OK
Word variations: 58.4783612612 55.4138127331 106% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6194690265 68% => OK
Sentence length: 23.8571428571 23.380412469 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4192946543 59.4972553346 49% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.214285714 141.124799967 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 23.380412469 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.642857142857 0.674092028746 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 45.1146278871 51.4728631049 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.02608695652 1.64882698954 62% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365602005903 0.391690518653 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.128624468311 0.123202303941 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0581039516296 0.077325440228 75% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.565073733496 0.547984918172 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.115346825288 0.149214159877 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156033742759 0.161403998019 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733196050728 0.0892212321368 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.329927929158 0.385218514788 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0053945030708 0.0692045440612 8% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254954454514 0.275328986314 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686731335421 0.0653680567796 105% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.66592920354 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 13.5995575221 66% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.