The ever growing world population is bringing with it a host of complex challenges – one of which is waste management. As consumerism is also increasing, the amount of waste generated per household is also on a rise. Effective waste management is important for health of citizens and the environment as well. However, for a solution like the one presented in the argument to succeed, the pros in favor should outweigh the cons against it and it doesn’t seem to be the case with the solution presented.
The practical application of the measuring trash from each household poses the biggest problem. Trash collected from individual households could be measured but a large population of any city resides in townships or apartment buildings where there is collection system. Measuring trash per household in such areas might not be practically possible.
Even if sophisticated measures are developed which make measuring trash from each household possible, such solutions can only work in developed urban areas. For example, in India and in many developing countries, a large population resides in small towns and villages where even basic waste collection are not in place, such a waste management system can be best said to be a far-fetched possibility.
In keeping the overall picture in mind, we could develop practical solutions to the environmental problems caused by waste. First, the waste disposal sites could be created outside the city which will help protect citizens’ health from the various deleterious effects caused by waste such as foul odour, poisonous gases etc. Second, awareness campaigns should be conducted among less educated and illiterate populations who don’t shy from throwing waste in public places.
In conclusion, before arriving at a solution the overall picture must be kept in mind not just a specific segment of population.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... India and in many developing countries, a large population resides in small town...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'well', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.261261261261 0.240241500013 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.162162162162 0.157235817809 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0960960960961 0.0880659088768 109% => OK
Adverbs: 0.048048048048 0.0497285424764 97% => OK
Pronouns: 0.012012012012 0.0444667217837 27% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.135135135135 0.12292977631 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0660660660661 0.0406280797675 163% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.94959103821 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.012012012012 0.030933414821 39% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0900900900901 0.0997080785238 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.03003003003 0.0249443105267 120% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.018018018018 0.0148568991511 121% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1884.0 2732.02544248 69% => OK
No of words: 297.0 452.878318584 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.34343434343 6.0361032391 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.58838876751 90% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.383838383838 0.366273622748 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.333333333333 0.280924506359 119% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.262626262626 0.200843997647 131% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.195286195286 0.132149295362 148% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94959103821 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 219.290929204 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582491582492 0.48968727796 119% => OK
Word variations: 62.789326742 55.4138127331 113% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6194690265 63% => OK
Sentence length: 22.8461538462 23.380412469 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4695963997 59.4972553346 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.923076923 141.124799967 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 23.380412469 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.846153846154 0.674092028746 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 56.1794871795 51.4728631049 109% => OK
Elegance: 2.08108108108 1.64882698954 126% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411275983758 0.391690518653 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.158231226326 0.123202303941 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0739711440064 0.077325440228 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.621565674586 0.547984918172 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.138895639139 0.149214159877 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163272000984 0.161403998019 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800591960845 0.0892212321368 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.231777828362 0.385218514788 60% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0357829804457 0.0692045440612 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224863324027 0.275328986314 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924697696769 0.0653680567796 141% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.4325221239 38% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.66592920354 191% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.